top of page

What is the simulator manufacturer's specification for simulator temperature?

Updated: May 1, 2022

With respect to the Guth 2100 wet bath simulator, 34.00 +/- .05 C is the manufacturer's specification. You will find this information in the manual included with the purchase of a new Guth 2100 simulator.


The manufacturer's specification for temperature stability on a Guth 2100 simulator is 34.00 ± .05° C.. It is not the 34.0 ± .2° C. expectation that applies in the breath room at time of use. The manufacturer's specification does not equal the ATC/CFS expectation for temperature range at time of use. The tighter standard of ± .05° C. is the expectation at initial inspection (see ATC "Best Practices" document) and upon annual inspection or inspection following maintenance.


A highly sensitive thermometer needs to be used during such initial, semi-annual, or annual inspections. The OPP use highly sensitive thermometers during their six-month-interval inspections.


If a police service conducts its own inspection, (or even worse, an adjustment or calibration), of a Guth 2100 simulator, only expecting ± .2° C., the inspection, adjustment. or calibration, does not match manufacturer’s specs and is inadequate to ensure reliability at time of use.


Quality Assurance in accordance with ATC "Best Practices" requires annual inspection, adjustment, and calibration of a Guth 2100 simulator to 34.00 ± .05° C.:


"All Approved Instruments, Approved Screening Devices and accessory equipment intended for active use in the program shall be individually inspected before being placed into service, and periodically thereafter, to ensure that they initially meet, and continue to meet the manufacturer’s specifications. The recommended interval between inspections is one year."


The manufacturer's specifications for the Guth 2100 can be found in the manual that comes with the purchase of a new Guth 2100.

From a Criminal Code section 320.31(1) perspective, the failure of a police service to properly inspect their Guth 2100 simulators, will not directly result in an acquittal. It is, however, a live section 8 systemic breach issue and a live background issue if a Court is considering the reliability of a "system calibration check" in section 320.31(1)(a) litigation.




コメント


If you are a member of the public, please don't attempt to use what you see or read at this site in Court. It is not evidence. The author is not a scientist. The author has a great deal of experience in cross-examining scientists about these issues, but the author is not a scientist. Hire a criminal lawyer in private practice in Ontario. Your lawyer can retain an expert. The author is a retired lawyer, not a lawyer in private practice. Read the statement of the purpose of this web site below.

© 2025 Allbiss Lawdata Ltd.

This site has been built by Allbiss Lawdata Ltd. All rights reserved. This is not a government web site.

For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: Allbiss Lawdata Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, 905-273-3322. The author and the participants make no representation or warranty  whatsoever as to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein.  WARNING: All information contained herein is provided  for the purpose of discussion and peer review only and should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any and all liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are strongly encouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of the information contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from a properly retained lawyer or attorney. 

WARNING: Please do not attempt to use any text, image, or video that you see on this site in Court. These comments, images, and videos are NOT EVIDENCE. The Courts will need to hear evidence from a properly qualified expert. The author is not a scientist. The author is not an expert. These pages exist to promote discussion among defence lawyers.

Intoxilyzer®  is a registered trademark of CMI, Inc. The Intoxilyzer® 5000C is an "approved instrument" in Canada.

Breathalyzer® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc., Breathalyzer Division. The owner of the trademark is Robert F. Borkenstein and Draeger Safety, Inc. has leased the exclusive rights of use from him. The Breathalyzer® 900 and Breathalyzer® 900A were "approved instruments" in Canada.

Alcotest® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc. The Alcotest® 7410 GLC and 6810 are each an "approved screening device" in Canada.

Datamaster®  is a registered trademark of National Patent Analytical Systems, Inc.  The BAC Datamaster® C  is an "approved instrument" in Canada.

bottom of page