top of page

What is Purge Fail on an Intoxilyzer ?

Writer: Stephen BissStephen Biss

What is a Purge Fail on an Intoxilyzer 8000C ?

What is a Purge File on an Intoxilyzer 5000C ?

How does this phenomenon affect reliability of a measurement result?


During an air blank the instrument runs the air pump until the indication of BAC remaining in the sample chamber system drops to approximately what the instrument perceives as 000. As you know from other blog entries, zero floats; it is never fixed; it rises and falls dependent upon ambient alcohol/interferent conditions and other external conditions. Below please see an example of a purge fail on an Intoxilyzer 5000, caused by radio frequency interference, which has changed (lowered) zero to about minus 057 relative to the room air. Note , that in this example, the cal. check reads 57-58 (with no simulator or alcohol standard attached) and the purge fail happens because the air blank indicated value can never get below 57. The indication in this example is reading high.

The CFS 8000C Training Aid describes a situation where an 8000C may read low - in circumstances where room air ambient alcohol (or an interferent) is rising. They note in bold text - "Subject tests will not be overestimated by alcohol in the room air". The issue for a defence lawyer in such circumstances is not whether subject test BAC is raised or lowered but rather the resulting unreliability of the control tests. If control test values have been lowered in the context of this phenomenon (i.e. the control tests read as 90 to 110 when they should read 81 to 101 - using 9 mg/100mL zero elevation) using 100 target value alcohol standard, then the control tests have become unreliable. If the cause of this condition is operator error, then the operator error has caused unreliability of the control tests aka cal. checks.


Excerpt from Training Aid re purge fail
Excerpt from CFS 8000C Training Aid December 2013 page 70 of 238

Watch the following example of a purge fail on an Intoxilyzer 8000. The experimenter uses a small bottle of Vodka near the breath tube.


Think about:


Why does the instrument generate an "ambient fail" message"?


Why does the instrument generate a "purge fail" message?


Will a control test (not shown in this video) be reliable immediately following these sequences? Note the screen saying 3:T1 DWIS. DWIS is (D)ry, W(et),(I)nternal,(S)tability. In other words, choose D, W, I, or S to run a cal. check. Would you run a cal. check in these circumstances and expect it to be reliable?


Comments


If you are a member of the public, please don't attempt to use what you see or read at this site in Court. It is not evidence. The author is not a scientist. The author has a great deal of experience in cross-examining scientists about these issues, but the author is not a scientist. Hire a criminal lawyer in private practice in Ontario. Your lawyer can retain an expert. The author is a retired lawyer, not a lawyer in private practice. Read the statement of the purpose of this web site below.

© 2025 Allbiss Lawdata Ltd.

This site has been built by Allbiss Lawdata Ltd. All rights reserved. This is not a government web site.

For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: Allbiss Lawdata Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, 905-273-3322. The author and the participants make no representation or warranty  whatsoever as to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein.  WARNING: All information contained herein is provided  for the purpose of discussion and peer review only and should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any and all liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are strongly encouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of the information contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from a properly retained lawyer or attorney. 

WARNING: Please do not attempt to use any text, image, or video that you see on this site in Court. These comments, images, and videos are NOT EVIDENCE. The Courts will need to hear evidence from a properly qualified expert. The author is not a scientist. The author is not an expert. These pages exist to promote discussion among defence lawyers.

Intoxilyzer®  is a registered trademark of CMI, Inc. The Intoxilyzer® 5000C is an "approved instrument" in Canada.

Breathalyzer® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc., Breathalyzer Division. The owner of the trademark is Robert F. Borkenstein and Draeger Safety, Inc. has leased the exclusive rights of use from him. The Breathalyzer® 900 and Breathalyzer® 900A were "approved instruments" in Canada.

Alcotest® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc. The Alcotest® 7410 GLC and 6810 are each an "approved screening device" in Canada.

Datamaster®  is a registered trademark of National Patent Analytical Systems, Inc.  The BAC Datamaster® C  is an "approved instrument" in Canada.

bottom of page