top of page

COBRA of Low Cal Check Sequences

Tip 22: Study #duisimulator COBRA for clusters of low climbing cal checks at 3400.

low climbing cal checks
Simulation by S. Biss of Low Climbing Cal Checks in COBRA V

It's a lot of work, but if you obtain complete COBRA in its native raw text fomat or Excel format, you can sometimes find several clusters of cal checks below 90 for the same instrument and detachment. You need to "Unmerge" the data first if it is COBRA V. Next highlight the data (omit the headings) and make sure the data is sorted chronologically. Use the "Find" function in Excel to hunt for instances of the word "Tolerance". Specifically you are looking in COBRA V for "Calibration Check Out of Tolerance" That will enable you to find cal checks that are "out of tolerance" i.e. below 90 or above 110. Look for a series of stand-alone cal check sequences where the first cal check is well below 90 but then over the course of one or two stand-alone cal checks the result climbs above 90. One might infer from such data that the initial cal checks were done by the QT when the simulator had not yet reached operating temperature (Henry's Law at work). Check the time stamps. Consider how much time it takes for the simulator to warm up. Consider the context of solution change dates and times before and after.

Now check the indicated simulator temperatures. Are they all 34.00? Consider the quote in Tip 21.

Perhaps police in that detachment have succumbed to temptation to always enter 34.00 no matter the real temperature of the simulator. Perhaps police are not following their protocols. Perhaps police are running diagnostics and cal. checks while out of the breath room or without paying attention to the instrument displays.

Your expert or the CFS expert may draw the inference that there is a serious problem with QA and QC in the detachment or that the approved instrument or accessory equipment were malfunctioning. CFS may also suggest that ambient conditions were very cold, e.g. in a breath truck during a holiday RIDE programme. In the latter case, be ready to cross-examine on ambient conditions precedent to good evidentiary breath testing and on simulator heater response time.

Kommentare


If you are a member of the public, please don't attempt to use what you see or read at this site in Court. It is not evidence. The author is not a scientist. The author has a great deal of experience in cross-examining scientists about these issues, but the author is not a scientist. Hire a criminal lawyer in private practice in Ontario. Your lawyer can retain an expert. The author is a retired lawyer, not a lawyer in private practice. Read the statement of the purpose of this web site below.

© 2025 Allbiss Lawdata Ltd.

This site has been built by Allbiss Lawdata Ltd. All rights reserved. This is not a government web site.

For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: Allbiss Lawdata Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, 905-273-3322. The author and the participants make no representation or warranty  whatsoever as to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein.  WARNING: All information contained herein is provided  for the purpose of discussion and peer review only and should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any and all liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are strongly encouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of the information contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from a properly retained lawyer or attorney. 

WARNING: Please do not attempt to use any text, image, or video that you see on this site in Court. These comments, images, and videos are NOT EVIDENCE. The Courts will need to hear evidence from a properly qualified expert. The author is not a scientist. The author is not an expert. These pages exist to promote discussion among defence lawyers.

Intoxilyzer®  is a registered trademark of CMI, Inc. The Intoxilyzer® 5000C is an "approved instrument" in Canada.

Breathalyzer® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc., Breathalyzer Division. The owner of the trademark is Robert F. Borkenstein and Draeger Safety, Inc. has leased the exclusive rights of use from him. The Breathalyzer® 900 and Breathalyzer® 900A were "approved instruments" in Canada.

Alcotest® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc. The Alcotest® 7410 GLC and 6810 are each an "approved screening device" in Canada.

Datamaster®  is a registered trademark of National Patent Analytical Systems, Inc.  The BAC Datamaster® C  is an "approved instrument" in Canada.

bottom of page