top of page

DUI Metrology Dictionary

duidictionary.com

Linearity

The actual electronic response of the electronics at the detector to any given concentration of ethyl alcohol in the sample chamber does not result in a direct linear relationship between alcohol concentration in the sample chamber and the voltages produced at the detector. The relationship is actually inverse and logarithmic - see Lambert-Beer law. However done in the software, the instrument needs to read those voltage fluctuations in the detector and convert them into an INDICATION (to use the metrological term)(digital display or printout) that is reasonably reliable across the MEASURING INTERVAL (metrological term). When that relationship is set up (the CALIBRATION CURVE), it is hoped that the instrument will be reliable at 10, 20, 50, 80, 100, 120, 160 mg% and so on. There may be a problem, however, on initial calibration or OVER TIME, with the values being reliable at some points in the measuring interval. We would then say that the linearizer circuitry/software is not performing its function - across the measuring interval. There is a problem with linearity between what goes in (the actual ethyl alcohol breath) and what comes out (the indication).

If you are a member of the public, please don't attempt to use what you see or read at this site in Court. It is not evidence. The author is not a scientist. The author has a great deal of experience in cross-examining scientists about these issues, but the author is not a scientist. Hire a criminal lawyer in private practice in Ontario. Your lawyer can retain an expert. The author is a retired lawyer, not a lawyer in private practice. Read the statement of the purpose of this web site below.

© 2025 Allbiss Lawdata Ltd.

This site has been built by Allbiss Lawdata Ltd. All rights reserved. This is not a government web site.

For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: Allbiss Lawdata Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, 905-273-3322. The author and the participants make no representation or warranty  whatsoever as to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein.  WARNING: All information contained herein is provided  for the purpose of discussion and peer review only and should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any and all liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are strongly encouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of the information contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from a properly retained lawyer or attorney. 

WARNING: Please do not attempt to use any text, image, or video that you see on this site in Court. These comments, images, and videos are NOT EVIDENCE. The Courts will need to hear evidence from a properly qualified expert. The author is not a scientist. The author is not an expert. These pages exist to promote discussion among defence lawyers.

Intoxilyzer®  is a registered trademark of CMI, Inc. The Intoxilyzer® 5000C is an "approved instrument" in Canada.

Breathalyzer® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc., Breathalyzer Division. The owner of the trademark is Robert F. Borkenstein and Draeger Safety, Inc. has leased the exclusive rights of use from him. The Breathalyzer® 900 and Breathalyzer® 900A were "approved instruments" in Canada.

Alcotest® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc. The Alcotest® 7410 GLC and 6810 are each an "approved screening device" in Canada.

Datamaster®  is a registered trademark of National Patent Analytical Systems, Inc.  The BAC Datamaster® C  is an "approved instrument" in Canada.

bottom of page