top of page

Video 02

Instrument Crash Solved by Shaking, Banging, and Tweaking

Intoxilyzer 5000 in need of maintenance. Second start. Instrument crashes again during start-up diagnostic RAM Check 2 error. Operator solves problem by tilting, shaking, banging, wiggling wires. Instrument resumes diagnostic and prints "Diagnostic OK". Instrument enters idle loop ready for breath test or other keyboard entry. Intoxilyzer® is a registered trademark of CMI, Inc. The Intoxilyzer® 5000C is an "approved instrument" in Canada.

This video shows that an unreliable approved instrument, in urgent need of maintenance, can pass Diagnostics checks. An approved instrument may display or print "Diagnostics OK" and yet be very unreliable. It seems that even though an instrument crashes during start-up, if you turn it off and on again, or do a warm reboot, you may be able to get it "working". It may still be unreliable as to ethyl alcohol quantitative analysis but it "works". There are serious problems with the idea that the function of an approved instrument is to "work" i.e. get from point A to point B. Crowns sometimes use the analogy of an automobile - it's not perfect but it gets from point A to point B. See for example section 320.34(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada:

"(3) The application shall be in writing and set out detailed particulars of the information that the accused seeks to have disclosed and the likely relevance of that information to determining whether the approved instrument was in proper working order. A copy of the application shall be given to the prosecutor at least 30 days before the day on which the application is to be heard."

If an instrument that cannot reliably quantitate ethyl alcohol passes its Diagnostics, is that proof that it "works" or is "working"? What does "proper working order" mean? Perhaps there is a prima facie appearance of "proper working order", after tilting, shaking, banging, and wiggling wires.

"Reliability" is a concept used in measurement science. It combines known accuracy, precision, and specificity, with no significant drift OVER TIME, together with known calibration, calibration intervals, qualification of operators, and following protocols set by the manufacturer and a program with supervision by a metrological authority.

Ontario
Intoxilyzer 5000 64 Series Upgraded to 66 Series
RFI
Interferent
MouthAlcohol
Maintenance
Keyboard
Errors
Reliability
SourceCode
Y
Y
Y

If you are a member of the public, please don't attempt to use what you see or read at this site in Court. It is not evidence. The author is not a scientist. The author has a great deal of experience in cross-examining scientists about these issues, but the author is not a scientist. Hire a criminal lawyer in private practice in Ontario. Your lawyer can retain an expert. The author is a retired lawyer, not a lawyer in private practice. Read the statement of the purpose of this web site below.

© 2025 Allbiss Lawdata Ltd.

This site has been built by Allbiss Lawdata Ltd. All rights reserved. This is not a government web site.

For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: Allbiss Lawdata Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, 905-273-3322. The author and the participants make no representation or warranty  whatsoever as to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein.  WARNING: All information contained herein is provided  for the purpose of discussion and peer review only and should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any and all liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are strongly encouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of the information contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from a properly retained lawyer or attorney. 

WARNING: Please do not attempt to use any text, image, or video that you see on this site in Court. These comments, images, and videos are NOT EVIDENCE. The Courts will need to hear evidence from a properly qualified expert. The author is not a scientist. The author is not an expert. These pages exist to promote discussion among defence lawyers.

Intoxilyzer®  is a registered trademark of CMI, Inc. The Intoxilyzer® 5000C is an "approved instrument" in Canada.

Breathalyzer® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc., Breathalyzer Division. The owner of the trademark is Robert F. Borkenstein and Draeger Safety, Inc. has leased the exclusive rights of use from him. The Breathalyzer® 900 and Breathalyzer® 900A were "approved instruments" in Canada.

Alcotest® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc. The Alcotest® 7410 GLC and 6810 are each an "approved screening device" in Canada.

Datamaster®  is a registered trademark of National Patent Analytical Systems, Inc.  The BAC Datamaster® C  is an "approved instrument" in Canada.

bottom of page