lawyers.ca duimetrology.com
905-273-3322 or 1-877-273-3322
Attempt to Distinguish R. v. Jackson
No Sampling of Aging Instruments in the Field
Durability Over Time
Each Test Stands on Its Own
All of the Software is Legally Relevant
International Std OIML R126 Mandates Maximum Permissible Error
No Supervision by ATC, CFS, or Anyone of Annual/Periodic Inspection SOPs
Is an Approved Instrument Really a Screening Device?
Manipulating Control Test Data to Enhance Precision
Error Rates and Drift in Precision
Federal Government Policy and Mandatory Calibration Intervals
Control Tests do not displace Formal Calibration Intervals
R. v. Vallentgoed Distinguished on facts - Short Calibration Interval
Short Calibration Interval and Reliability
Linearity Studies are Done on New Instruments not Aging Instruments
Instrumental Deviations from Beer-Lambert Law
Bandwidth of Filters Changes Over Time
Beer-Lambert Law as Stated in Training Aid is Over-Simplified and Inadequate
The "known" is the original calibration of the instrument
Traceability of a Measurement Result