|
! |Home |Drinking and Driving, Drunk Driving, Impaired Driving | Spousal Assault | Young Offenders |Lawyers.ca
|
The Great Youth Criminal Justice Act DebateThe Act went into force April 1, 2003
See also the International Drinking and Driving Debate YCJAYOAThe black and white view of youth criminal justicePolice searches of young persons on the sidewalk
January 2002 - Age of Criminal Responsibility February 2002 - Child Protection or Criminal Justice Model March 2002 - Rights Prior to and During Interrogation April 2002 - Parents' Rights on Arrest of Child September 2002 - School Uniforms November 2002 - Making Adults as Accountable as Young Persons December 2002 - Prosecuting 10 and 11 year olds as criminals January 2003 - Prosecuting 16 and 17 year olds as adults February 2003 - Interrogation of Young Persons April 2003 Should the Age of Consent be Raised to 18? May 2003 Young Persons Going to Jail June 2003 Preemptive Strikes Against Bullies July 2003 Decriminalization of Marijuana November 2003 Young Criminals Ages 10 and 11 December 2003 Extrajudicial Sanctions and Alternative Measures January 2004 Conferences under the YCJA February 2004 Young persons with poor understanding of counsel March 2004 Parents more involved in procedure of YCJA April 2004 Bail release for young persons May 2004 Knowledge of Canadian trial procedures by young persons September 2004 The black and white view of youth criminal justice
Index to the Youth Criminal Justice ActCriminal Lawyers' Association C-7 Written Submissions YCJA Case Briefs for CLA Members Letman Oral Submissions re C-7 17:1120-30, 1200, 1210-15, 1235-40 Index to Justice Committee C-7 Discussions Senate Hearings:
The Successful Defendant, The Unsuccessful Defendant and The Burlington Youth Court
4. Extrajudicial Principles and Objectives, Alternative Measures 5. Objectives
13. Designation of youth justice court
24. Private prosecutions
61. Adult Sentence and Election See also Department of Justice Flow Charts
125. Disclosure of Information in a Record
Read What Others Have SaidCommentsI'm glad the name of the new statute does not imply that all young persons are offenders. CommentsI believe they should leave the YOA as it is! There is no need for harsher sentences for young people! How can they be accountable for their actions? Take a 15 year old, they are not allowed to drive, we don't let them vote..but we will throw him in the slammer?? I believe these young people need help, prison will make them commit more crimes. All this talk about victims in the new Act.. Let me ask you this? Are these young offenders not victims of circumstance? A child grows up in an abusive alcoholic home and commits a crime, he is punished and thrown in jail, how is this young person compensated for their life of trauma. Why did they commit the crime? The justice system is so worried about compensated the store owner from whom the YO stole from, but what about compensation for this young person's abuse?? Where is the justice? They should also leave sec. 56 alone, young people need the protection, they do not fully understand! Anne (Police Foundations Student) CommentsI think that the young offenders act should stay just the way it is. Teens today get into problems themselves they do not get pushed into making wrong decisions by other people. Even if someone else pushes/peer pressures them into it, that is for the court to decide. Teens need to be punished in some way. There has to be some sort of consequences for their actions and the current Young Offenders Act is just what they need. It shouldn't be changed, it is fine the way it is. CommentsYouth crimes must have consequences that fit the crime, and at the same time have meaning for the young people and their victims
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|Stephen
R. Biss, Barrister & Solicitor|Impaired
Driving |DUI DWI Courthouses
|Instruments|YOA
YCJA Debate|Bills|
CLA|Privacy
Stephen R. Biss, Barrister & Solicitor 470 Hensall Circle, Suite 303 905-273-3322 or 1-877-273-3322
Advertisement. Any legal opinions expressed at this site relate to the Province of Ontario, Canada only. If you reside or carry on business in any other jurisdiction please consult a lawyer, solicitor, or attorney in your own jurisdiction. WARNING: All information contained herein is provided for the purpose of providing basic information only and should not be construed as formal legal advice. The author disclaims any and all liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are strongly encouraged to seek and retain professional legal advice before relying upon any of the information contained herein. |