Case Briefs
Database For Canadian Criminal Law

 R. v. Milne

List of Similar Cases | Add Data to This Case | Edit


  Home |Add a new case | List of Issues 
Search for a Case by Name, Cite, Issue, Facts and Reasons

Find A Case That Starts With


ID: 73

Title: R. v. Milne

Cite: 107 C.C.C. (3d) 118

Court: ON CA

Date: 16/05/1996

Justices: Houlden, Abella and Moldaver JJ.A.

Result: Appeal allowed; acquittal entered.

WhoWon: D

Issue: Use of Physical & ASD Tests Prior to RTC




Upon approaching accused police officer detected a strong order of alcohol on his breath. Accused admitted drinking two glasses of wine. Officer then performed a number of sobriety tests. He failed them. Accused was arrested and given breath demand. Note read his rights to counsel after the physical tests had been performed. Edit


The trial judge should not have considered the evidence resulting from the co-ordination tests when deciding whether Crown had proven impaired driving beyond a reasonable doubt. Purpose of these tests under section 48(1) HTA legitimate. Edit

 Biss Private Use Only



Click this link to Add Your Comments about: R. v. Milne

Click here to Add a Hyperlink re  R. v. Milne