Case Briefs
Database For Canadian Criminal Law

 R. v. Milne

List of Similar Cases | Add Data to This Case | Edit

Biss Private Use Only Version

CanLII Version

 

 

  Home |Add a new case | List of Issues 
Search for a Case by Name, Cite, Issue, Facts and Reasons

Find A Case That Starts With

Canadian lawyers and Judges are invited to add Additional Issues, Facts, Reasons, Anecdotes, History, Comments, Distinguished, Overruled, Approved, Considered, Corrections, or anything else helpful to readers by clicking the Add Data to This Case hyperlink above. 

ID: 73

Title: R. v. Milne

Cite: 107 C.C.C. (3d) 118

Court: ON CA

Date: 16/05/1996

Justices: Houlden, Abella and Moldaver JJ.A.

Result: Appeal allowed; acquittal entered.

WhoWon: D

Issue: Use of Physical & ASD Tests Prior to RTC


Charges:  


 

Facts

Upon approaching accused police officer detected a strong order of alcohol on his breath. Accused admitted drinking two glasses of wine. Officer then performed a number of sobriety tests. He failed them. Accused was arrested and given breath demand. Note read his rights to counsel after the physical tests had been performed. Edit


Held

The trial judge should not have considered the evidence resulting from the co-ordination tests when deciding whether Crown had proven impaired driving beyond a reasonable doubt. Purpose of these tests under section 48(1) HTA legitimate. Edit


 Biss Private Use Only


 CanLII


 

Click this link to Add Your Comments about: R. v. Milne

Click here to Add a Hyperlink re  R. v. Milne

Biss Private Use Only