Case Briefs
Database For Canadian Criminal Law

 R. v. A.J.

List of Similar Cases | Add Data to This Case | Edit

 

  Home |Add a new case | List of Issues 
Search for a Case by Name, Cite, Issue, Facts and Reasons

Find A Case That Starts With

 

ID: 546

Title: R. v. A.J.

Cite: [2002] O.J. No. 4999

Court: ON CJ

Date: 23/12/2002

Justices: Wolder J.

Result: mandatory minimum shall not apply

WhoWon: D

Issue: Sentence - Impaired Minimum Penalty


Charges: Refusal to Provide Breathalyzer Sample


 

Facts

The accused had been convicted of operating a motor vehicle while having more than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 milligrams of blood six weeks before being charged with refusal to provide a breath sample. A CPIC check revealed, to the police, that the accused had been convicted of a previous offence. Edit


Reasons

As was found in R. v. Middlebrook, [2002] O.J. No. 666, ss. 255(1) of the Criminal Code violates section 12 of the Charter. As there is no minimum mandatory jail sentence for second time offenders who cause bodily harm, the minimum mandatory jail sentence for simple refusal poses a grossly disproportionate punishment. Edit


 

Click this link to Add Your Comments about: R. v. A.J.

Click here to Add a Hyperlink re  R. v. A.J.