Case Briefs
Database For Canadian Criminal Law

 Reference s. 94(2) MVA

List of Similar Cases | Add Data to This Case | Edit

 

  Home |Add a new case | List of Issues 
Search for a Case by Name, Cite, Issue, Facts and Reasons

Find A Case That Starts With

 

ID: 227

Title: Reference s. 94(2) MVA

Cite: [1985] 2 S.C.R. 486

Court: SCC

Date: 17/12/1985

Justices: Dickson C.J. and Beetz, McIntyre, Chouinard, Lamer, Wilson and Le Dain JJ.

Result: Appeal dismissed, unconstitutional

WhoWon: D

Issue: Unreasonable Delay


Charges:  


 

Facts

Reference re Motor Vehicle Act B.C. , s. 94, minimum jail absolute liability offence, drive while prohibited or suspended Edit


Reasons

A law that has the potential to convict a person who has not really done anything wrong offends the principles of fundamental justice and, if imprisonment is available as a penalty, such a law then violates a person's right to liberty under s. 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Constitution Act, 1982, as enacted by the Canada Act, 1982, 1982 (U.K.), c. 11). ... In other words, absolute liability and imprisonment cannot be combined. ...it would be wrong to interpret the term "fundamental justice" as being synonymous with natural justice as the Attorney General of British Columbia and others have suggested. To do so would strip the protected interests of much, if not most, of their content and leave the "right" to life, liberty and security of the person in a sorely emaciated state Edit


 Biss Private Use Only


 

Click this link to Add Your Comments about: Reference s. 94(2) MVA

Click here to Add a Hyperlink re  Reference s. 94(2) MVA