Case Briefs
Database For Canadian Criminal Law

 R. v. Hughes

List of Similar Cases | Add Data to This Case | Edit

 

  Home |Add a new case | List of Issues 
Search for a Case by Name, Cite, Issue, Facts and Reasons

Find A Case That Starts With

 

ID: 111

Title: R. v. Hughes

Cite: 70 C.C.C. (2d) 42

Court: AL CA

Date: 09/08/1982

Justices: Lieberman, Prowse, McClung and Belzil JJ.A.

Result: Appeal allowed, new trial ordered

WhoWon: D

Issue: Evidence to the Contrary


Charges: Over 80 180/150/160


 

Facts

The accused was stopped and failed an A.L.E.R.T. test. The accused was then taken to the local RCMP detachment where he failed an approved screening test. Three tests had to be administered as the second test reading had a difference greater then 20 points of the first test. At trial, the accused introduced expert evidence of a former RCMP officer who had possession of an approved screening device and performed a simulation test to determine that the accused would have been below the legal limit. The trial judge instructed the jury to disregard the simulation and to disregard the erroneous second reading. Edit


Reasons

The trial judge erred in telling the jury to disregard the evidence. The trial judge should have told the jury that if the evidence raised a reasonable doubt, then the accused should be acquitted on the charge of over 80. Edit


 Biss Private Use Only


 

Click this link to Add Your Comments about: R. v. Hughes

Click here to Add a Hyperlink re  R. v. Hughes