DUI DWI: International Referral Database of DUI, DWI, Impaired and Drunk Driving, Drinking and Driving, Lawyers & Attorneys

State or Province | County | Region | Attorneys | Courthouses | License & Traffic Offices | Legislation | Instruments | Standards | Experts  | Articles | Videos  
Add Attorney
| Add Courthouse | Add DMV Office | Add Legislation | Add Instrument | Add Standards | Add Videos
| Home | Debate | Adding Your Firm Law Student DUI Dictionary  | Law Student Encyclopaedia
Words are used in Canada? DUI | DWI | Drunk Driving | Drinking and Driving | DUI LawsDWI Laws | Ontario dui | Ontario dui laws | Impaired Driving | Toronto DUI | Brampton DUI | Mississauga DUI

DUI : Driving Under the Influence; DWI : Driving While Intoxicated; OUI: Operating Under the Influence; OWI: Operating While Intoxicated; Impaired Driving: Impaired in Canada to Slightest Degree; Over 80: Excess BAC alcohol in Canada over 80 mg/100mL;  Care  or Control:  Occupy seat normally occupied by operator in Canada,  act or series of acts  involving use of car , fittings or equipment

Missouri-dui-attorneys

| DUI Law DWI Law |

Click on the banner for these Missouri dui attorneys for more information on Missouri DUI laws and legislation. These are not paid banners. Banners are ranked in order of recent contributions or updates to the legislation section database by these Missouri dui attorneys:

 Click here

 

 

  Missouri  

Each of the following Missouri-dui-attorneys is a Missouri member of the DUI DWI: International Referral Database of DUI, DWI, Impaired and Drunk Driving, Drinking and Driving, Lawyers & Attorneys who has been asked to provide basic Missouri information about laws in MO DUI Court. These Missouri-dui-attorneys do not practice in association. This database originated with a listserv group of Missouri-dui-attorneys and other DUI attorneys who wanted to know basic information from DUI attorneys in other provinces and states so that they could refer DUI business. Participation has always been and will continue to be free to all Missouri-dui-attorneys who certify that they are DUI defence or DUI defense attorneys, who promise to keep their DUI law contributions, including courthouse profiles, DUI legislation sections, and DUI breath instruments information, up to date, and who are willing to create some links to the database from their own DUI attorneys web site. Members of the public are invited to visit the links to the profiles for each of these Missouri-dui-attorneys and to browse for Missouri DUI information herein. Free banner advertising on the top of this Missouri-dui-attorneys page is only available to  Missouri DUI attorneys who have made significant contributions to the Missouri DUI legislation sections database. We appreciate the Missouri-dui-attorneys who have taken the time to provide detailed information below. Any Missouri-dui-attorneys who wish to join the free database please click here. Missouri DUI attorneys can improve their rank order below for free by improving their contributions to the Summary of Law field in their profile and notifying Allbiss Lawdata Ltd. at the email address on the page bottom.

DUI Courthouses | Motor Vehicle Offices | BAC Instruments | Breath and Blood Collection Standards | Legislation

 

 

 

Photo Wines Law Offices L.C. , MO DUI Law, DWI Laws

Missouri is a very conservative state, and especially so in the area of DWI law. The most of the Missouri statutes that effect DWI cases and the loss of the driving license can be found in Sections 577 and 302.

Photo Norton Hare, LLC , MO DUI Law, DWI Laws

please see our website at http://www.nortonhare.com Norton Hare, LLC focuses on DUI/Traffic, Criminal Defense, Personal Injury and Domestic Relations cases. All of our lawyers are members of and have been trained by the National College for DUI Defense. For more information about our firm and how we can assist in your Missouri DUI, please visit our website http://www.nortonhare.com. Our law firm has put together a book that we give to Missouri DWI clients, and we have reproduced it online at http://www.nortonhare.com/Missouri_DWI.htm. Although it was written by one of our attorneys, credit must be given to the many brilliant lawyers that we have had the pleasure of discussing this subject with over the years, and especially the attorneys at the National College for DUI Defense. It is from those people that we have developed many of our ideas concerning DWI defense. For information on how to choose the best Missouri DWI attorney for you, please refer to our firm's website. It must be stressed that none of the information contained in the documents at the site should be construed as legal advice, nor does it create any attorney-client relationship between Norton Hare L.L.C. and the reader. We are providing it purely for informational purposes regarding DWI law in the state of Missouri. This information is copyrighted by Norton Hare L.L.C., and all rights therein are reserved. Do not download, copy, distribute or otherwise reproduce this information except in the form that it is presented here and with proper credit given to Norton Hare L.L.C. Further, this information in no way represents the totality of the law and issues related to Driving While Intoxicated in Missouri. It is but a brief overview. It is certainly no substitute for the advice of an attorney, and no person should undertake the awesome challenge of a DWI defense case without competent counsel. Please check with an attorney. A Brief Guide to Missouri DWI Law Table of Contents: Preface to Missouri DWI Law Introduction to Missouri DWI Law Getting Stopped for DWI in Missouri Signs of Intoxication Field Sobriety Tests Implied Consent Advisories The Breath Test The Blood Test The Urine Test Refusal of Chemical Testing The Criminal Justice System Administrative Driver's License Suspensions Offenses Related to Missouri DWI Non-Judicial Penalties for DWI in Missouri (Also Titled: What Does it Really Cost to Plead Guilty) Conclusion This section deals only with the criminal case and does not address the civil or administrative action against your driver's license. Further, this section deals only with the judicial penalties for the criminal offense of DWI. There are many non-judicial penalties that will follow a no contest plea, guilty plea, or conviction for a DWI. These include increased insurance costs, problems renting cars, and job-barriers. The non-judicial penalties will be addressed in a separate section, as well. Please fill out our electronic form and submit it to Norton Hare, L.L.C. for a free contact from one of our attorneys regarding your defense in a DUI/DWI case. TWO TYPES OF DUI: As discussed earlier, there are two separate ways for the prosecutor to prove a DWI case: (1) By proving that the defendant was a less safe driver due to impairment by alcohol and/or drugs (including prescription or non-prescription drugs) by using the officer's observations, including manner of driving, field sobriety tests, the smell of alcohol, etc. (2) By proving that the defendant was driving a vehicle at a time when his blood alcohol level was .08 or greater. The prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the test the defendant was given was a valid test and administered properly. The second type of DWI, is actually known as a BAC, for "Blood Alcohol Content", and requires a blood, breath or urine test. The ramifications of a conviction for a BAC may be different than for a DWI. In a refusal case, the prosecutor has no choice but to pursue the first type of "traditional" DWI case. As of April 2003, if a person who holds a CDL is convicted of a DUI, DWI, or is suspended administratively for a test failure, the driver will lose his CDL for one year on the first occurrence and LIFETIME on the second occurrence. This applies even if the person was driving his OWN non-commercial vehicle and was not working when arrested. Also, CDL holders are not eligible for diversion. PENALTIES: The penalties for driving under the influence depend on whether one has had a prior "alcohol related law enforcement contact". A prior alcohol related contact includes, among other things, a refusal to submit to testing, administrative suspension/revocation, and DWI or BAC convictions from Missouri or another state. Missouri has two important windows of time: 5 years and 10 years. This calculation is made based on the date of the prior conviction to the date of the current arrest. SUSPENDED IMPOSITION OF SENTENCE: Before we talk about the penalties of conviction it is necessary that we look at disposition known as a "Suspended Imposition of Sentence", most commonly referred to as a "S.I.S.". An SIS is an option by which the defendant admits guilt to the DUI or another offense, but is not formally convicted. Whether a person is granted a SIS or not is up to the judge. Generally, a SIS is an agreement between the defendant and the prosecutor in which the defendant agrees to accept responsibility for the crime, agrees not to violate any laws for one year, not to drink alcohol for some period of time (usually one or two years), not to go to places that serve alcohol except sporting events and restaurants, and to take random urine samples to insure compliance. The defendant must also attend the SATOP class (discussed below), and do anything else requested by an alcohol counselor, probation officer or prosecutor. The prosecutor agrees that, if the defendant holds up her end of the bargain, the charges will be dismissed at the end of the probationary period. A SIS does not result in a criminal suspension of driving privileges and is not a conviction. However, one could still have his driving privileges suspended in the administrative (civil) proceedings. A SIS is considered a "conviction" should the person get a subsequent DUI within ten years. A SIS may be denied to anyone who has had a prior conviction or diversion for anything, that tested at over a .20 on the breath or blood test, or that was particularly rude or aggressive toward the arresting officer. SATOP: SATOP stands for "Substance Abuse Traffic Offender" and everyone who has a SIS, is convicted for DWI/BAC, or who gets an alcohol related suspension/revocation must complete the class before he or she can be successfully discharged from a criminal sanction and get his or her driver's license reinstated. The class presents alcohol and drug education and treatment and is available all over the state of Missouri. There are three levels of SATOP: (1) Offender Education Program (OEP): This level consists of 10 hours of education which can be done on a weekend day or over a couple of weekday nights. It costs about $200.00. (2) Weekend Intervention Program (WIP): This consists of 48 hours locked down in a secure facility in which treatment and education is provided. It costs about $400.00. (3) Clinical Intervention Program (CIP): This level consists of about 50 hours of outpatient treatment, including individual and group therapy. It costs about $800.00. Conviction: A person that pleads no contest, pleads guilty or is convicted at trial is subject to the following judicial penalties: DWI FIRST OFFENSE: Conviction of a first DWI is a Class B misdemeanor. JAIL: Up to a maximum of six (6) months imprisonment. FINE: Up to $500.00. Court costs may also be between $10.00 and $100.00. PROBATION: The general terms of probation are no drinking, do not break the law, go to SATOP, etc. Probation usually lasts 1 to 2 years. A conviction with probation is commonly referred to as a "Suspended Execution of Sentence" or SES. SUSPENSION OF DRIVING PRIVILEGES: A criminal conviction of a first time DUI results in a 30 day suspension of driving privileges followed by a 60 restriction to driving only to and from work, in the course of employment, or to alcohol treatment. There are no hardships or exemptions available. This suspension goes on the person's driving record. The court may also require that a person be restricted to driving a motor vehicle which has an ignition interlock device while on probation. The device costs $50.00-100.00 to install and $50.00-$75.00 per month to maintain. A conviction will result in 8 points being assessed against the driver's license. DWI SECOND OFFENSE: Conviction of a second DWI within a five yeaar period is a Class A misdemeanor. JAIL: Up to a maximum of one year in jail. FINE: Up to $1,000.00, plus court costs of between $10.00 and $100.00. PROBATION: Only after a person has served a mandatory minimum of 48 hours of incarceration are they eligible for probation. The jail requirement may be waived in lieu of doing 10 hours of community service. The terms of probation are standard: no breaking the law, no drinking, no going to places where alcohol is served, attend SATOP, etc. Court ordered AA meetings, outpatient treatment, or inpatient treatment programs are also a possibility. Probation will often be for a one or two year period. REVOCATION OF DRIVER'S LICENSE: A criminal conviction of a second time DWI within 5 years results in a five (5) year revocation of driving privileges. A hardship license may not be applied for until 2 of the 5 year revocation has been served. This suspension goes on the person's driving record. 12 points are assessed against the driver's license regardless of how old the first DWI conviction was. The court must also require that a person be restricted to driving a motor vehicle which has an ignition interlock device while on probation. The device costs $50.00-100.00 to install and $50.00-$75.00 per month to maintain. DWI THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT OFFENSE: Conviction of three or more DWI's within 10 years results may mean that the driver is deemed to be a "Persistent Offender" and guilty of a Class D Felony. There will also be a 10 year denial of driving privileges. JAIL: Up to five (5) years in prison. FINE: Up to $5,000.00, plus court costs of between $10.00 to $100.00. PROBATION: Missouri law prohibits a suspended execution of sentence for a felony DWI. The court may suspend execution of sentence after 10 days in jail or 60 days of community service. The defendant is then placed on a probation. REVOCATION OF DRIVING PRIVILEGES: Upon a third or subsequent criminal conviction for DWI, the defendant's driver's license is revoked for 10 years regardless of how old the two prior convictions are. These suspensions go on the person's driving record. If convicted of a felony DWI, no hardship license is available. If the DWI is a third, but not a felony, a hardship license may be applied for after 3 years. The court must also require that a person be restricted to driving a motor vehicle which has an ignition interlock device while on probation. The device costs $50.00-100.00 to install and $50.00-$75.00 per month to maintain. PLEA BARGAINING: Sometimes a prosecutor can be convinced that a DWI conviction is unlikely at trial and he or she will agree to reduce the DWI charge to another offense, such as "Careless and Imprudent Driving" or "Improper Lane Change". The penalties, probation or SIS requirements may or may not be the same as those suffered under a DWI disposition, but the person's driving record will not reflect a DWI. EXPUNGEMENT: Missouri law provides that a person may have a one-time alcohol related offense, either a DWI or BAC, expunged from his or her driving record after ten (10) years have passed from the date of conviction. The driver must file an application in the court of conviction and must not have had any other alcohol related contacts during the 10 year period. Administrative driver's license actions may not be expunged.

Photo DWI Institute of Missouri & The Guilfoil Law Group, LLC , MO DUI Law, DWI Laws

SUMMARY OF MISSOURI DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCES STATUTES

Prohibited Vehicular Activity

Operation: A person commits the crime of “driving while intoxicated” if he operates a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated condition. 577.010, RSMo. 2000. NOTE: “actual physical control” has not been the standard in Missouri DWI cases since 1996.

It must always be shown that the driver drove or operated a vehicle. 577.001.1, RSMo 2000 states: “as used in this chapter, the term ‘drive’, ‘driving’, ‘operate’, or ‘operating’ means physically driving or operating a motor vehicle.”

Operation can be proven where any subject turns on a vehicle or otherwise engages the machinery of the vehicle. For instance, a person may be deemed to be operating a motor vehicle where the engine is running with the driver asleep in the car, pulled over on the side of the road. Cox v. Dir. Of Revenue, 98 S.W.3d 548 (Mo. Banc 2003); State v. Wiles, 26 S.W.3d 436 (Mo. App. S.D. 2000); State v. Mitchell, 77 S.W.3d 637 (Mo. App. W.D. 2002).

Or similarly, a person steering a moving vehicle down a hill, out of gas with the engine off, is “operating” for the purposes of the statute. Herr. v. Dir. Of Revenue, 134 S.W.3d 686 (Mo. App. E.D. 2004).

Further information on operation: http://missouri-dui-dwi-defense.com/Missouri-DUI-DWI-Lawyer/Missouri-DUI-DWI-BAC-Common-Driver-Questions-Elements-Driving-Operation-Vehicle-Intoxicated.shtml

Covered Vehicles or Devices:

The term “Motor vehicle” is not defined in the Missouri DWI statutes. However, it seems clear under recent Missouri caselaw that any motorized vehicle will suffice for these purposes. There are also separate statutes for Boating While Intoxicated cases, where a motor is not even required. Golf carts, ATVs and mini-bikes have all been deemed valid “motor vehicles” for Missouri DWI purposes. Covert v. Dir. Of Revenue, 151 S.W.3d 70 (Mo. App. E.D. 2004); State v. Laplante, 148 S.W.3d 347 (Mo. App. S.D. 2004); State v. Bailey, 140 S.W.3d 260 (Mo. App. S.D. 2004).

Covered Locations:

You do not have to be driving a motor vehicle on a “highway” to receive a DWI in Missouri. Missouri caselaw provides a person may be guilty of DWI anywhere in the state, despite language in the implied consent warning using language of “upon public highways of the state.” Private roads, private property, parking lots, etc. are all fair game. Bertram v. Dir. of Revenue, 930 S.W.2d 7 (Mo. App. W.D. 1996); Peeler v. Dir. of Revenue, 934 S.W.2d 329 (Mo. App. E.D. 1996).

Intoxicated:

It must be shown that a subject is intoxicated for a Missouri DWI charge, 577.010 RSMo., or possessing a blood alcohol concentration in excess of 0.08% or higher (without having to show any intoxication) for a BAC case (excessive blood alcohol content) pursuant to 577.012 RSMo. Any intoxication that in any manner impairs the ability of a person to operate a motor vehicle is sufficient to sustain a conviction under the Missouri DWI statute. State v. Raines, 62 S.W.2d 727, 729 (Mo. 1933).

Driving While Intoxicated Offenses:

DWI (driving while intoxicated) “A person commits the crime of “driving while intoxicated” if he operates a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated or drugged condition. Section 577.010, RSMo. 2000.

BAC (excessive blood alcohol content) (The “per se” law) (subject has a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% or higher. Section 577.012, RSMo. 2000. (0.08% BAC equals grams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath. 577.037.).

Driving while intoxicated (drugs) 577.010 lists being under the influence of a drug in the DWI statute. State v. Wilson, 846 S.W.2d 796 (Mo. App. S.D. 1993); State v. Scholl, 114 S.W.3d 304 (Mo. App. E.D. 2003); State v. Falcone, 918 S.W.2d 288 (Mo. App. S.D. 1996); State v. Walter, 918 S.W.2d 927 (Mo. App. E.D. 1996); Johnson v. Dir. Of Revenue, 168 S.W.3d 139 (Mo. App. W.D. 2005); State v. Friend, 943 S.W.2d 800 (Mo. App. W.D. 1997); State v. Walter, 918 S.W.2d 927 (Mo. App. E.D. 1996).

302.505 (DWI Under 21) If under 21, zero tolerance rules apply. 302.505 provides the per se alcohol limit for a minor to be DWI is 0.02% BAC. The under-aged driver is facing license suspension under zero tolerance, but there is currently no criminal sanction for under-aged DWI in Missouri.

Commercial Motor Vehicles If the case involves a commercial motor vehicle, “if there is .04 percentage or greater by weight of alcohol in his or her blood.” 302.780 RSMo 2000. Commercial driver will be placed out of service for 24 hours if any alcohol is found in their system. 302.755. For more information on Commercial Driver’s Licenses (CDLs) in Missouri DWI Cases http://missouri-dui-dwi-defense.com/Missouri-DUI-DWI-Lawyer/Missouri-DUI-DWI-BAC-Commercial-Driver-Licenses-CDL.shtml

Other Criminal Offenses Involving Under the Influence Offenses:

The main criminal felony driving offenses in Missouri are: DWI Persistent Offender— RSMo. Section 577.023; Assault Second Degree— RSMo. Section 565.060(4); Involuntary Manslaughter— RSMo. Section 565.024; Murder Second Degree— RSMo. Section 565.021; Leaving the Scene of a Motor Vehicle Accident— RSMo. Section 577.060; Felony Driving While Revoked or Suspended— RSMo. Section 302.321; and Felony Operation of a Motor Vehicle Without a Proper License— RSMo. Section 302.020.

For More information Click here: http://missouri-dui-dwi-defense.com/Missouri-DUI-DWI-Lawyer/Missouri-DUI-DWI-BAC-Felony-driving-offenses.shtml

Degree of Impairment Required:

Any intoxication that in any manner impairs the ability of a person to operate an automobile is sufficient to sustain a conviction for DWI. State v. Raines, 62 S.W.2d 727, 729 (Mo. 1933). A chemical test result at or above 0.08% BAC is required for a conviction for “BAC” (the “per se” law).

Penalties for Driving Under the Influence Offenses:

First offense (Class B Misdemeanor) up to 6 months is jail, up to $500.00 fine.

Second offense (Class A Misdemeanor, “prior offender”) two offenses in five years enhances up to prior offender: up to one year in jail, up to a $1000.00 fine.

Third offense (Class D Felony, “persistent offender”) three offenses in ten years: up to five years in jail, up to a $5000.00 fine.

NEW IN 2005: Section 577.023 RSMo.:

Fourth offense aggravated offender (Class C Felony) up to seven years in jail, up to a $5000.00 fine.

Fifth offense chronic offender (Class B Felony) not less than five years nor more than 15 years in prison.

An "aggravated offender" is a person who:(a) Has pleaded guilty to or has been found guilty of three or more intoxication-related traffic offenses; or (b) Has pleaded guilty to or has been found guilty of one or more intoxication- related traffic offense and, in addition, any of the following: involuntary manslaughter under subdivision (2) or (3) of subsection 1 of section 565.024, RSMo; murder in the second degree under section 565.021, RSMo, where the underlying felony is an intoxication-related traffic offense; or assault in the second degree under subdivision (4) of subsection 1 of section 565.060, RSMo; or assault of a law enforcement officer in the second degree under subdivision (4) of subsection 1 of section 565.082, RSMo;

(2) A "chronic offender" is: (a) A person who has pleaded guilty to or has been found guilty of four or more intoxication-related traffic offenses; or (b) A person who has pleaded guilty to or has been found guilty of, on two or more separate occasions, any combination of the following: involuntary manslaughter under subdivision (2) or (3) of subsection 1 of section 565.024, RSMo; murder in the second degree under section 565.021, RSMo, where the underlying felony is an intoxication-related traffic offense; assault in the second degree under subdivision (4) of subsection 1 of section 565.060, RSMo; or assault of a law enforcement officer in the second degree under subdivision (4) of subsection 1 of section 565.082, RSMo; or (c) A person who has pleaded guilty to or has been found guilty of two or more intoxication-related traffic offenses and, in addition, any of the following: involuntary manslaughter under subdivision (2) or (3) of subsection 1 of section 565.024, RSMo; murder in the second degree under section 565.021, RSMo, where the underlying felony is an intoxication-related traffic offense; assault in the second degree under subdivision (4) of subsection 1 of section 565.060, RSMo; or assault of a law enforcement officer in the second degree under subdivision (4) of subsection 1 of section 565.082, RSMo;

Penalties for Other Criminal Offenses Involving Under the Influence Offenses:

See “felony driving offenses” above. More information: http://missouri-dui-dwi-defense.com/Missouri-DUI-DWI-Lawyer/Missouri-DUI-DWI-BAC-Felony-driving-offenses.shtml

Implied Consent Laws:

Tests permitted: Blood, breath or urine – two samples as directed by law enforcement. Subject does not get to choose which test to take. 577.020.1. Krakover v. Dir. Of Revenue, 128 S.W.3d 589 (Mo. App. E.D. 2004); Dotzauer v. Dir. Of Revenue, 131 S.W.3d 371 (Mo. App. E.D. 2004); Murphy v. Dir. Of Revenue, 136 S.W.3d 141 (Mo. App. S.D. 2004); Kiso v. King, 691 S.W.2d 374 (Mo. App. W.D. 1985; State v. Brown, 804 S.W.2d 396 (Mo. App. 1991).

Type of advisement required: Of implied consent law requirements; of penalties for refusing testing

Unlike many states, in Missouri there are two separate civil proceedings where a driver might get his or her license suspended for DWI. There are administrative hearing proceedings, governed by 302.500-302.345, RSMo, for those drivers who gave a chemical test above the applicable legal limit.

There is also a separate civil license suspension hearing for chemical test refusal cases, governed by 577.020 and 577.041. First offense administrative proceedings (where the driver gave a chemical sample over the limit) are 90-day license suspensions; one year for any case where there is a prior offense within the last five years. There is a one-year license suspension for any chemical test refusal case.

For more general information:http://missouri-dui-dwi-defense.com/Missouri-DUI-DWI-Lawyer/Missouri-DUI-DWI-BAC-Law-General-Offense-Categories.shtml

Admissibility of refusal: The driver’s refusal to take field sobriety tests or a refusal to take requested chemical tests are admissible against him or her. Cain v. Dir. of Revenue, 130 S.W.3d 1 (Mo. App. S.D. 2003). Edmisten v. Dir. of Revenue, 92 S.W.3d 270, 274 (Mo. App. W.D. 2002); Hockman v. Dir. of Revenue, 103 S.W.3d 382, 385 (Mo. App. W.D. 2003); State v. Myers, 940 S.W.2d 64, 65 (Mo. App. S.D. 1997); State v. McCarty, 875 S.W.2d 622, 623 (Mo. App. S.D. 1994); RSMo. Section § 577.041; State v. Rose, 86 S.W.3d 90 (Mo. App. W.D. 2002); State v. Williams, 847 S.W.2d 111, 113 (Mo. App. W.D. 1992)

Implied Consent Laws – Accidents Involving Death or Serious Injury Tests permitted: Any two test of the driver’s blood, breath or urine are permitted in any Missouri DWI case. Subject does not get to choose which test to take. 577.020.1. Krakover v. Dir. Of Revenue, 128 S.W.3d 589 (Mo. App. E.D. 2004); Dotzauer v. Dir. Of Revenue, 131 S.W.3d 371 (Mo. App. E.D. 2004); Murphy v. Dir. Of Revenue, 136 S.W.3d 141 (Mo. App. S.D. 2004); Kiso v. King,691 S.W.2d 374 (Mo. App. W.D. 1985; State v. Brown, 804 S.W.2d 396 (Mo. App. 1991).

Rules Governing the Administration of Chemical Tests in Missouri

Chemical tests in Missouri must be performed in accordance with Missouri Department of Health Regulations 19 CSR 25-30.080. To lay a proper foundation for a breath test in a Missouri DWI trial, the State must be prepared to show that the chemical test was administered by an officer holding a valid Type II or Type III permit issued by the Department of Health, that the chemical testing machine was approved by the Department of Health, that the chemical test was administered in accordance with the guidelines established by the Department of Health, and that a maintenance test had been performed on the breath testing machine by a Type II permit holder within 35 days preceding the chemical test. Tidwell v. Dir. of Revenue, 931 S.W.2d 488 (Mo. App. S.D. 1996).

Blood-Drawing Statute:

There are both Missouri statutes and Missouri Department of Health regulations regarding blood draws in Missouri DWI cases. Missouri Department of Health Regulation 19 CSR 25-30.070(1) requires that “(b)lood samples shall be taken in accordance with the provisions of sections 577.029”

RSMo. 577.029 provides that:

“A licenses physician, registered nurse, or trained medical technician at the place of his employment, acting at the request and direction of the law enforcement officer, shall withdraw blood for the purposes of determining the alcohol content of the blood, unless such medical personnel, in his good faith medical judgment, believes such procedure would endanger the life or health of the person in custody. Blood may be withdrawn only by such medical personnel, but such restriction shall not apply to the taking of a breath test, a saliva specimen, or a urine specimen. In withdrawing blood for the purposes of determining the content thereof, only a previously unused and sterile needle and sterile vessel shall be utilized and the withdrawal shall otherwise be in strict accord with accepted medical practices. A nonalcoholic antiseptic shall be used for cleansing the skin prior to venapuncture. Upon the request of the person who is tested, full information concerning the test taken at the direction of the law enforcement officer shall be made available to him.” Id. (Emphasis added).

The State has the burden of proving absolute and literal compliance with the provisions of RSMo. 577.029 before a blood test result may be admitted into evidence. State v. Setter, 763 S.W.2d 228, 230 (Mo. App. 1988). Furthermore, “(r)ules of a state administrative agency which have been duly promulgated pursuant to proper delegated authority have the full force and effect of law.” Woodall v. Dir. of Revenue, 795 S.W.2d 419 (Mo. Ct. App. 1980). “Missouri courts have previously determined that the state must demonstrate absolute and literal compliance with statutory provisions contained in Chapter 577 regulating the manner in which blood alcohol tests are administered prerequisite to introducing the test results into evidence. See Setter, supra. These statutory enactments serve as “a substitute for the common law foundation for the introduction of evidence of analysis for blood alcohol, and are mandatory. State v. Peters, 729 S.W.2d 243, 245 (Mo. App. 1987). Similarly, where the Missouri Department of Health has enacted regulations concerning the proper methods of conducting blood alcohol tests as authorized by Chapter 577, including urine analysis, the State must demonstrate absolute and literal compliance with these regulations prerequisite to introducing the test results into evidence.” State v. Regalado, 806 S.W.2d 86, 88 (Mo. App. 1991).

Independent Test Statute:

Missouri law provides that a driver, once they have taken the chemical test requested by the law enforcement officer, may request an independent test at his or her own expense. § 577.020.5, RSMo.

Pursuant to § 577.020.5, RSMo, a subject who is arrested for DWI and submits to test at the direction of the law enforcement officer has a right to obtain an independent test by a physician, qualified technician, chemist, registered nurse, or other qualified person, at the choosing and expense of the person to be tested. Pierce v. Dir. of Revenue, 51 S.W.3d 888 (Mo. App. W.D. 2001).

It is important to note that the police do not have to inform this driver of this right under the law unless the driver knows to ask for it. The statute also does not allow the driver to choose which chemical test to take, and if the driver refuses to take the chemical test requested, he or she then waives the right to a separate test at his or her own expense, and will be deemed to have “refused.” Turner v. Dir. of Revenue, 829 S.W.2d 671 (Mo. App. W.D. 1992).

Plea Bargaining Statute:

None

Rules for Civil Administrative Hearings v. Refusal Hearings

As noted above, there are two separate civil license suspension hearings possible in Missouri, depending on whether or not a chemical test was taken, and failed, or whether or not the driver allegedly refused a chemical test.

Breath Test Administrative Hearing Cases. Regarding civil license suspensions where the driver gave a chemical test and the result was above the applicable legal limit, the issues in this type of administrative proceeding are whether there was probable cause to arrest the subject for some type of alcohol-related traffic offense and whether the subject was driving with a BAC at or above the legal limit. House v. Dir. of Revenue, 997 S.W.2d 135 (Mo. App. S.D. 1999).

In these types of cases, the driver is required to receive a notice of suspension revocation (Form 2385) if the test results are available at the time of arrest, (or it can be later mailed if the results are not available until later), and the sworn report of the officer must be filed with the Missouri Director of Revenue.

If the driver wishes to challenge the suspension/revocation of his or her driver’s license for submitting a chemical test over the legal limit, a request for administrative hearing must be filed within 15 days of being served the notice, whether the service was in person or otherwise. There are no exceptions to the 15 day filing rule, and requests that are not timely filed will be denied. Darr v. Dir. of Revenue, 897 S.W.2d 697 (Mo. App. E.D. 1994).

This type of administrative hearing is not conducted in the Circuit Court of the county where the driver was arrested, but is conducted by Director of Revenue at the first level. The driver does not get a hearing in front of a Circuit Court judge in the county of arrest unless the driver exhausts all of his or her administrative remedies. Marquart v. Dir. of Revenue, 896 S.W.2d 716 (Mo. App. E.D. 1995). In other words, if the driver does not appear at the first hearing rights to an actual trial in Circuit Court on a trial de novo appeal are waived.

If a request for an administrative hearing is requested in a timely manner in such an administrative proceeding, the driver may keep driving while the hearing is pending. If the driver does not prevail on the first level administrative hearing, he or she will have a license suspension imposed 15 days after the hearing officer’s adverse ruling against the driver, regardless or whether the driver even ultimately wins the matter at trial de novo in Circuit Court on appeal. State ex rel. Director of Revenue v. Gabbert, 925 S.W.2d 838 (Mo. banc 1996).

If the driver loses the first-level administrative hearing, a petition for trial de novo must be timely filed in the Circuit Court of the county of arrest.

Chemical Test Refusal Cases. Administrative license suspension cases involving the driver allegedly refusing a chemical test are handled differently than cases where the driver gave a chemical test result over the legal limit.

A civil refusal case is also begun by an officer filing a sworn report in the case, but the driver is given a notice of suspension/revocation for refusal. (Form 4323).

A driver’s rights and duties to properly request a civil hearing are different for a refusal. To properly request a civil refusal hearing, the driver must file within 30 days a Petition for Review challenging the refusal, directly to the Circuit Court of the county of arrest. If the driver fails to file the petition within this timeframe, his or her revocation for refusal is final. Romans v. Dir. of Revenue, 783 S.W.2d 894 (Mo. banc 1990).

The relevant issues in a refusal hearing are: whether the subject was arrested (or stopped, if under age 21); whether the officer had reasonable grounds to believe that the subject was operating a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated condition (or with a BAC of at least .02 if under age 21); and whether the subject refused to submit to the test. As part of the “refusal issue,” the State must show that a proper implied consent warning was read, and that 20 minutes were given to contact an attorney if the driver asked to speak with counsel.

 

Missouri DUI Attorneys Missouri DUI Lawyers Missouri DUI Attorney Missouri DUI Lawyer

 

 

 

Definitions from various jurisdictions contributed by law students:

A.L.E.R.T.: A roadside tester screening device. An approved screening device Model J3A formerly used in Ontario.
absorption: Ethanol, drinking alcohol, disappears in the mouth, the stomach and the small intestine and enters the blood.

BACGraph2004Horiz.jpg (205995 bytes)Graph of blood alcohol concentration over time as a 155 lb. male consumes 4 341 ml. beers with a full stomach. Food has slowed this absorption down. Without food the absorption would be quicker.

Notice the time 1900 to 2200. At first there is absorption of alcohol through the mouth, stomach, and intestines and into the blood. Almost immediately elimination begins as the liver starts to metabolize the alcohol. The blood alcohol concentration rises during this absorptrion phase because absorption greatly exceeds elimination.

After that there is a plateau where the BAC stays fairly constant or bounces up and down a bit. Plateau absorption rate equals elimination rate approximately but stomach flap sometimes opens to let contents into intestine. Some people may plateau for 2 hours.

The elimination phase starts about 2300. elimination would have continued through 0100 and beyond at a rate of about 10 to 20 mg/100mls per hour. Back calculations work ONLY in the elimination phase, if at all.

Don't use this information to calculate your own BAC, that could be dangerous. The BAC equivalent of each bottle of beer varies from individual to individual and varies with weight, gender, and body shape.

accuracy: Accuracy has to do with whether or not a breath test instrument's analysis of blood alcohol concentration is the same as or similar to the subject's true blood alcohol concentration. If a person's true blood alcohol concentration is 100 mg/100mLs then an accurate breath test instrument is going to provide an analysis of near 100 mg/100mLs.

Precision has to do with whether the breath test instrument will give the same or similar result multiple times for the same subject, assuming that the person's blood alcohol concentration isn't changing over time (which it probably is).

See the Target Analogy.

acetone: An interferent that sometimes looks to a breath instrument like ethanol during breath tests. When an IR breath test instrument analyzes substances in the sample chamber, IR light is absorbed by acetone at some of the same wavelengths as ethanol. If acetone is present, the instrument which uses only two or three filters (one for each wavelength) may analyze acetone as if it were ethanol. Such instruments are generally designed to notice, if acetone is present, that the ratio of absorption of IR at two different wavelengths isn't the ratio that it is supposed to be, triggering an error message. The instruments, however, are preset to not notice interferents below a certain threshold. The problem becomes much more difficult if there is a mix of ethanol, acetone, and other stuff. There are also problems if the instrument attempts to subtract the acetone reading from the combined acetone and ethanol reading. Acetone is found in many products such as nail polish remover.
admissability of certificate: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
Admissibility of Physicals and ASD Prior to Rights: Assume that a police officer uses a p.b.t., screening device, or physical tests at roadside for the purpose of determining whether or not he or she has reasonable grounds to arrest a person for drunk driving. If the tests are compelled or if the driver willingly complies without first being warned that these tests will be used against his or her interests or without first being given an opportunity to consult with legal counsel, is it fair that these tests be used against the driver when it comes time for Court. The officer must make quick and important decisions at roadside as to whether or not to arrest. Those decisions need to be based on quickly obtained information. But should this urgent information ultimately be used against the driver at the criminal trial. Does compelling an individual to help the police violate basic rights?
aggravating circumstances: The circumstances of the offence that make this particular case worse than an ordinary example of this offence. In impaired driving cases, high BAC readings, bad driving, high speeds, danger to the public, child in the car, an accident or near accident, injuries to a victim, or some combination of these may be aggravating circumstances.
alcohol: Ethanol (drinking alcohol)is produced from sugar by fermentation of grains. However, there are lots of other alcohols - molecules with a hydroxyl OH attachment. Other non-drinking alcohols include methyl alcohol (methanol) and isopropanol.
approved container: A method of retaining a portion of a breath sample for later independent testing.
Approved Instrument: An instrument that is designed to receive and make an analysis of a sample of the breath of a person in order to measure the concentration of alcohol in the blood.
approved screening device: roadside tester, PBT, P.B.T., minimal intrusion on driver, rough idea of blood alcohol concentration, pass, warn, fail. In order to minimize police interference with motorists, police will sometimes use a mobile roadside device at R.I.D.E. or other holiday programs to stop motorists and perform a quick check of blood alcohol concentration through the use of a roadside tester.
arbitrary detention: The detention of a person despite a lack of evidence or likelihood that they have committed a crime.
As Soon as Practicable: Breath tests are obviously never seized at exactly the same point in time as the moment when the alleged drunk driving occurred. The analysis of breath at the time of the breath tests will almost always have a different result than the subject's true blood alcohol concentration at the time of driving, because of the phenomena of absorption, distribution, and elimination of alcohol in the human body over time. Different jurisdictions use different methods to solve this problem. How does your jurisdiction deal with this problem? Some jurisdictions require the breath tests to be taken "as soon as practicable".
BAC: Blood Alcohol Concentration, alcohol concentration in the bloodstream. Sometimes expressed as milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood (mgs/100mLs), millimoles per litre (mmol/L), or grams of alcohol per 100 mls of blood (grams of alcohol per 210 litres deep lung air). Not the same thing as Breath Alcohol Concentration (BrAC).
blood demand: In some jurisdictions a police officer may demand a sample of a driver's blood for blood tests for the presence and concentration of alcohol or a drug.
blood tests: In some jurisdictions police may make a blood demand for a sample of a person's blood in order to determine the concentration of alcohol or a drug in a driver's body.
bolus drinking: Administering a very large quantity of alcohol quickly through the mouth sometimes using a funnel. The concentration of alcohol in the blood will rise very significantly but absorption may be delayed depending on food, stomach health, and type of beverage. Very dangerous.

It may be an explanation in some unique cases as to why breath instrument readings exceed true BAC at time of driving.

calibration of approved screening device: Manufacturers, entities responsible for setting national or state or provincial breath and blood standards, and individual police services appear to have different standards or no standards for frequency of calibration checks and if necessary re-calibration of screening devices aka roadside testers. It seems unfair that drivers should be subjected to testing if the device is not known to be reliable. Perhaps police, lawyers, and the Courts should be consulting the manufacturer's operating manual (R. v. Bernshaw)and the relevant national or provincial standards before relying on the accuracy of these devices. Assuming we are speaking about fuel cell devices, their calibration is very different from IR devices.
Care or Control: charge of or power to direct or command, Some use of the car or its fittings and equipment, or some course of conduct associated with the vehicle which would involve a risk of putting the vehicle in motion so that it could become dangerous
Carter defence: Sometimes a person accused of a per se over 80 offence tells their lawyer what they drank and when and the lawyer hires a toxicologist to calculate the person's estimated blood alcohol concentration at the time of driving. If the evidence of the driver is believed and the toxicologist's expert evidence is accepted and that evidence contradicts the breath instrument reading, in some juridictions there may be a defence. In Canada this is called a Carter defence or "evidence to the contrary".
Causes Bodily Harm: induce, make, be cause of, part and parcel, in order to enable, to continue or facilitate, injured as the result of an accident
cell phone interference: There is considerable debate about this subject. Some breath instruments have radio frequency interference detectors that automatically shut down the test sequence and print an error card if RFI interference is detected. Some experts take the position that cell phone interference can cause elevated BAC readings on breath test instruments. They suggest that if a cell phone is transmitting (a call is in progress) and it is placed near the instrument there will be strange results. Other experts insist that this is not the case. There is a need for study of this issue.

Police radios and other radio transmitters are also alleged to impact on the accuracy of breath tests.

certificate of analyst, certificate of analysis: The Standard Alcohol Solution (SAS) that is used as an external standard to run a calibration check of a breath instrument is contained in a simulator. Unless that SAS is reliable and accurate the external standard is useless. Prior to use, a batch of SAS is tested in a lab using a gas chromatograph to determine that it is a proper standard alcohol solution. The analyst who tests and approves the SAS as suitable for use will complete a certificate that he or she has analyzed a representative sample of the lot and certifies it in a document called a certificate of analysis.
Certificate of Qualified Technician: Instead of calling viva voce evidence from a qualified breath tech who conducted a breath test using a breath instrument and having him or her prove that the machine was working properly, it may be appropriate for the breath tech to prepare a certificate that is filed in Court as a shortcut for the prosecutor.

This is different from the Certificate of Analysis of a standard alcohol solution.

chemical tests: If you have been arrested for DUI, DWI, OUI, OWI or a related charge, you may be required to provide a sample of your blood, breath or urine for the purpose of testing your blood alcohol concentration. The concept of chemical tests includes blood, breath and urine. See the "implied consent" law that may apply in your state.
Constitutional Validity of Legislation: Sometimes laws made by a parliament or a legislature may contradict the supreme law of a country, its constitution. A constitutional democratic government gets its authority and power to make law from its constitution. Laws made exceeding the jurisdiction given to that government without the authority of the constitution may be meaningless if a Court in that country makes that determination. When a law is unconstitutional the Courts may say that the law is meaningless or that it should be "read down" so as not to be beyond the jurisdiction of the government. Courts have a duty to construe and apply laws to specific fact situations. Sometime they have to construe a particular law as meaning nothing and sometimes they have to construe the law as meaning something different from the letter of the law passed by Parliament.

A law is ultra vires if it is beyond the jurisdiction of the legislature.

conviction: There is a big difference between being investigated for a crime and being convicted of a crime. Just because an allegation has been made or a person has been arrested by police doesn't mean that they are guilty of a crime. In countries where there is a presumption of innocence, you aren't gulity until you've been proven guilty by a prosecutor after evidence has been submitted and accepted by a judge. People often are too quick to assume that a charge laid means that a conviction will automatically follow. A "conviction" refers to a formal finding by a judge that a person is guilty of the offence charged and that the judge has decided to enter a conviction.
Counsel: barrister or group of barristers, lawyer or attorney, advocate. Interesting legal issues arise where an individual seeks legal advice from a friend or relative who is a police officer or wishes to retain a paralegal.
Counsel of Choice: If an individual is arrested or detained they may have the right to consult with a lawyer or attorney. That right may be part of constitutional law, judge made law, or a particular statute. The right to the consultation may be long or short, in person or over the telephone, under the control of the police or in privacy, all depending on the jurisdiction and the context. The person charged may or may not have the right to choose a particular lawyer or attorney to consult. "Counsel of choice" refers to the right to consult with the particular lawyer or attorney that the detainee chooses, not simply one chosen by the police or supplied by the government.
Coutts_Milne_Huff_White: Three important Canadian cases having to do with what evidentiary use can be made of statements, screening device tests, and physical tests obtained by police during the period prior to right to counsel. There may be a difference between evidence gathered for the purpose of reasonable and probable grounds for arrest and demand as opposed to proving guilt at trial.
criminal negligence: When an individual has the mens rea (knowledge) that a crime has been, is or will be committed. This includes being willfully blind or careless.
criminal procedure: Laws related to procedure in the criminal court system. Not substantive criminal law related to criminal offences or evidence law related to evidence rules at trial. Criminal procedure law governs such things as warrants, arrest, bail hearings, notices to parents for juveniles, preliminary inquiries, informations and indictments, Crown and defence elections, mode of trial, jury selection, jury trial procedure, procedure at trial, and sentencing procedure.
D.U.I.: Driving Under the Inflence
Demand: Before a police officer has the right to seize a sample of breath or blood there may be conditions precedent. In some jurisdictions, the seizure will not be lawful unless the police officer makes a formal Demand for such a sample upon reasonable grounds for such a formal Demand.
demerit points: some jurisdictions attach a number of demerit points for a particular offence, licence is suspended or licensee is brought in for an interview after a number of points are accumulated
designation: A Canadian accused can appoint counsel to represent the accused in any proceedings by filing a designation with the court.
diabetic: DKA; Ketoacidosis; by-products of fat breakdown are ketones: fruity smell on breath, acetone, fasting, not eaten food all day. Persons who suffer from diabetes may be producing acetone on their breath. Acetone may mimic ethanol drinking-alcohol on breath instrument readings and cause inflated readings. Acetone detect and subtract circuits may not be adequate to detect or remove the acetone portion of the reading.
Disclosure: The accused should be afforded the opportunity to see the case for the prosecution, the evidence that the State or Crown will use against him or her long before the trial begins. At the very least the defence should receive discovery of a copy of the prosecutor's brief of police officers' and witnesses' statements before plea.
disqualification: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
distinction between impaired driving and over 80: some jurisdictions have separate offences for operation of a motor vehicle while ability to do so impaired and the separate per se offence of having a blood alcohol concentration above 0, 50, 80, or 100 mgs/100mLs
double jeopardy: A defense in which an individual cannot be charged and tried twice based on the same set of facts and events.
double punishment: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
drug: A chemical substance that affects the function of living things. Drugs can be used to treat illness, or modify a chemical process in the body for a specific purpose. Drugs can also impair one's ability to operate a motor vehicle. Some drugs work together with alcohol to exacerbate impairment.
duplicity: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
elimination: Ethanol is absorbed in the mouth, the stomach, and the small intestine. Rate of absorption depends on many factors.

Ethanol is distributed throughout the body.

Ethanol is metabolized by the liver and eliminated at a rate of 10 to 20 mg/100Mls/hr.

employee education: Your company will need to educate employees as to their unique blood alcohol concentration effects of each standard drink as well including both absorption and elimination. Employees need to learn how to carefully monitor and document their drinking prior to driving. A business may lose a valuable employee to detention, jail, injury, or embarrassment if its management does not take steps to educate employees about alcohol absorption, distribution, elimination and the effects of alcohol at different stages.
evidence tending to show: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
Evidence to the Contrary: In some jurisdictions the evidence and presumptions of accuracy and identity of a breath instrument can be contradicted by evidence of the accused as to alcohol consumed and the expert evidence of a toxicologist. In Canada this is often called a Carter defence.
Exclusion of Evidence Remedy 24(2): In Canada, if police or the Crown violate rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Court may make an order excluding evidence of confessions, breath tests or other evidence that would otherwise be admissible. This is the Canadian equivalent of "suppression".
exemption for employment purposes: In some jurisdictions it may be possible to have an exception to a licence suspension to permit driving for employment purposes only. Other jurisdictions prohibit all driving during suspension. See also licence for work
expert affidavits: A sworn statement of fact acknowledged by an expert in their field. A taker of oaths such as a notary public must witness the affidavit.
failure to stop: This occurs when an individual is involved in an driving related accident, and they fail to stop to exchange information or to check if other were harmed.
Fifteen Minutes Apart: There is some evidentiary advantage to obtaining two breath analysis results obtained from two different samples separated in time. If the results are in good agreement (eg. within 20 mg/100 mLs of each other truncated) then it is safer to assume that the breath sampling procedure followed has not resulted in an erroneous result caused by, for example, the presence of mouth alcohol. In Canada the protocol is at least 15 minutes apart but other protocols are used elsewhere.
first offence: On your first offence of impaired driving, driving with a blood alcohol content over 80, or refusing to give a breath or blood sample there may be minimum penalties. The minimum penalties that a judge must impose in Canada for a first offence would be a fine of at least $600 and prohibition from driving anywhere in Canada for at least one year. The existence of a pardon may cause a second or third offence to be treated as a first in Canada. A second offence which occurred at a point in time before the actual conviction for the first may also be treated in Canada as a first offence for Criminal Code purposes.
Forthwith: A term found which can be found in contracts, court orders, and statutes, which means as soon as it can be reasonably done. It also implies immediacy, with no excuses for delay. Breath test demands in Canada must be made forthwith or as soon as practicable.
Gas chromatography: a method to check the concentration of a sample of standard alcohol solution (SAS)
headspace: headspace: the vapour portion above the liquid in a simulator containing standard alcohol solution (SAS) if the headspace has not yet warmed up to the same temperature as the liquid in the simulator, low caliberation checks may result.
Ignition interlock: a driver of a vehicle equipped with this device will not be able to start the car or continue to drive it if he or she does not blow into the machine, a failure may result in lights flashing and horn blowing.
immoblized vehicle : No synopsis available yet. Please add.
Impaired: There is a difference between a person being "impaired" by alcohol and a persons's "ability to operate a motor vehicle" being impaired by alcohol. In Canada see the R. v. Stellato case for a definition of "impairment".
impound vehicle: Some jurisdictions permit the police to seize the vehicle used in the DUI or the drive while suspended offence. The vehicle may be towed to a police or private pound and held pending further investigation or payment of a fee. Some jurisdictions allow the police to hold the vehicle for a certain number of days.
Included Offences: A person tried for an offence such as break, enter, and theft may be found not guilty of the offence charged of break, enter and theft but guilty of the lesser and included offence of theft. In Canada, Crowns frequently take the position that impaired care or control of a motor vehicle is an included offence to the charge of impaired driving. In other words, if the person cannot be proven to be driving they can still be convicted of care or control. This is not the case in some other jurisdictions.
indicia of impairment: Reasonable grounds to suspect that an individual is impaired (i.e. smell of alcohol).
Information Component Right to Counsel: Right to Counsel. Police in Canada are obliged to comply with both the informational component of the Charter section 10b right to counsel as well as provide the opportunity to retain and instruct counsel without delay. The informational component includes the obligation under R. v. Brydges to tell the detainee about the existence of and how to access 24 hour emergency duty counsel.
instrument: a tool,a machine used to accomplish something, a breath instrument

Some people get very upset when you call a breath instrument a "machine". In the field of forensic breath testing the term implies precision, accuracy, and following protocol.

insurance implications: A DUI allegation or conviction may be very costly for many years with a very large surcharge imposed by your insurance company. Insurance companies may also raise rates as a result of administrative licence suspensions, accidents, and plea bargains to lesser offences such as careless driving.
Intent - Mens Rea: Mens Rea refers to the mental state (guilty mind) that must be an adjunct to a prohibited act before it can be considered a crime. Different type of offences require different mental states. For example, was there intention to commit theft or was there some knowledge that the property possessed is stolen. Generally an essential ingredient to every criminal offence, but not necessarily applicable to minor provincial offences. A guilty act requires a guilty mind: Actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea
interferent: Also known as "interferent bias"

Evidentiary breath instruments are designed to alert the qualified technician if an interferent, such as acetone, is detected on the breath of the test subject. The ethanol molecule's IR signature has similarities at certain wavelengths to acetone, methanol, and isopropanol. This means that if a breath instrument is not designed to alert the qualified technician as to the presence of an interferent, then acetone, methanol, isopropanol (if present on the breath or in the room) could falsely elevate the breath readings. Evaluation of evidentiary breath instruments requires that particular substances that are produced endogenously and could be present in human breath, be tested to determine if they could create such an interferent bias.

Non-evidentiary screening devices usually do not contain the hardware or software necessay to alert for or subtract for other alcohols such as isopropanol. The presence of a substance such as isopropanol can damage a fuel cell sensor.

The Effect of Volatile Substances on the Intoxilyzer 5000C Breathtesting Instrument

Isopropanol Interference with Breath Alcohol Analysis: A Case Report

internal standards: Internal standards within the breath testing instrument are different from an external standard alcohol solution in a separate simulator instrument. If a diagnostic test of the breath instrument using an internal standard indicates a fail the instrument is supposed to shut down automatically and indicate an error message.
Interpreter During Right to Counsel: In English Canada a person, whose first language is not English, has the right to an interpreter during the informational component of their right to counsel and in actually making use of that right. In practice the 24 hour duty counsel system in Canada makes extensive use of interpreters speaking many many languages. The same rule should apply to persons who are hearing impaired. The same rule applies in French Canada. There is a big difference between a police officer interpreter who understands rudimentary sign language and a proper interpreter.
intoxicated drivers: Intoxication is being drunk, being excited or elated beyond self-control by an intoxicating substance, such as ethanol.

What proportion of drivers are intoxicated during the day? What proportion of drivers are intoxicated during the evening? What proportion of drivers are intoxicated in the early morning hours?

Intoxication During Right to Counsel: Is it a defence to a per se over 80 offence to say that you were too drunk to understand your right to counsel and so you couldn't understand the informational component of your right to counsel, which means you didn't waive your right to counsel prior to the breath tests, which means you weren't properly afforded your right to counsel and therefore the taking of breath tests by police is illegal - all because you were too drunk? Needless to say Courts don't particularly like this argument in drunk driving cases.
involuntary impairment: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
IR: Infrared Spectrometry, measure blood alcohol concentration by analyzing a breath sample in a chamber through which IR light is passed. Different molecules (eg. ethanol) absorb IR light to different extents at different wavelengths. By measuring how much IR light is absorbed at a wavelength relevant to ethanol one can determine the concentration of ethanol in the sample compared to no ethanol. However, any other substance that absorbs IR at the same frequency will mess up that calculation - we call those interferents. The best breath machines are ones that are specific (specificity) to ethanol.
isopropanol: rubbing alcohol, an interferent that sometimes looks to an IR breath instrument just like ethanol. Used by and inhaled by people in the printing industry. Hopefully the breath test instrument will flag the isopropanol contaminated breath test with an error message. However, combinations of ethanol and isopropanol are more difficult to detect.
jury: A group of lay ordinary persons who try issues of fact. The answer to the question of whether a trial will be by judge alone or judge and jury depends on whether or not a jury trial is available according to the law in the particular state or province.

If a jury trial is available, one needs to consider the functions of the judge and the jury. Generally the judge makes determinations of law and the jury makes determinations of fact.

juvenile convictions: What impact do juvenile convictions or youth court findings of guilt have on sentencing for an adult offence? Do minimum sentences apply?
keys in the ignition: See also care or control. If a drinking driver has stopped driving, parked the car, and gone to sleep behind the wheel is he or she still "drinking and drivin". Different jurisdictions deal with this problem in different ways. On the other hand some people use a motor vehicle or a motorhome as a house. Can you be convicted if you enter or decide to use the motor vehicle as a house rather than as a vehicle? It depends on your jurisdiction. Speak to a lawyer in your own community. Keys in the ignition msay or may not be one of the indicia that you intended to operate the vehicle in which you were sleeping.
last chance: How many times should a person get to try to blow into a breath machine? Should there be a warning before a refusal charge is laid?
last drink defence: Also known as rising alcohol defence or bolus drinking defence. If absorption is still greater than elimination because alcohol consumption was recent and perhaps bolus, then BAC at time of driving may be less than that at time of breath test at police station.
licence for work: Is there any way I can keep my driver's licence if I am convicted of DUI? Some jurisdictions have automaqtic licence suspensions that operate upon conviction and are beyond the control of the Judge or the prosecutor. Some jurisdictions have minimum punishments such that a Judge has no option but to impose the mandatory minimum prohibition order.
limitation period: The maximum length of time after an offence during which a criminal charge can be laid. A period of time specified in a statute within which a criminal proceeding must be commenced. A statute of limitations.
lowest reading: See 258(1)(c) in Canada.
maximum penalty: The maximum penalty varies.
medical practitioner: An individual who is licensed and/or registered to practice medicine.
mens rea: Intent in criminal law. As a general rule, you can't be guilty of a criminal offence if you inadvertently did something against the law. Crimes require a deliberate act or recklessness. There are lots of exceptions to this general rule.
mmol: 1 millimole equals 4.6 mg/100mls or .0046
Motor Vehicle: A self-propelled wheeled conveyance, such as a car or truck, that does not travel on rails
mouth alcohol: Also known as "mouth alcohol bias"

Ethanol remaining in the mouth following a recent drink (last 15 minutes) or as the result of vomitting, GERD, burping, mouthwash may exaggerate breath test readings dramatically. Evidentiary breath instruments are usually designed so as to alert the qualified technician that mouth alcohol or stomach alcohol has been detected rather than deep lung air alcohol. This is accomplished through a slope detection algorithm in the software which looks for a peak in the readings coming in near the beginning of the breath sample with a rapid drop off followed by a combined effect of deep lung air alcohol and the mouth. The instrument shuts down and prints a warning often stated as "Invalid Sample".

Unfortunately, although the software usually does what it is supposed to do (i.e. watch for the peak and report), mouth alcohol bias can still occur due to the combined analysis of a small amount of mouth alcohol combined with a fairly low true blood alcohol concentration. It is very possible for an individual with a true BAC of 30 mg/100mLs to blow a 120 mg/100mLs reading and for a person with a true BAC of 115 mg/100mLs to blow over 300 mg/100mLs. A person whose true BAC is just under the legal limit (eg. 78 mg/100mLs) could blow just over the legal limit (eg. 87 mg/100mLs).

In some jurisdictions there is a requirement for two tests. If those tests are well spread out in time (eg. 15 minutes apart) and the two tests are in good agreement with each other (eg. within 20 mg/100mls of each other truncated) then mouth alcohol bias is less likely.

Another best practice to reduce the possibility of mouth alcohol bias is a deprivation period (observation period) of 15 to 20 minutes before the breath tests wherein the qualified technician keeps the subject under continuous observation for that period to ensure that he or she does not vommit, consume alcohol, gum or breath strips, belch or burp.

Non-evidentiary breath instruments used as screening devices generally do not have mouth alcohol slope detectors.

mouth alcohol delay: See Bernshaw in Canada. A police officer should not immediately administer a roadside screening device test if he or she has information that there may be a source of mouth alcohol (eg. a very recent drink of alcohol, recent mouthwash, vomit), rather the screening device test should be delayed about 15 or 20 minutes to make sure that there is no alcohol in the mouth that would cause mouth alcohol bias.
multiple convictions: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
Necessity: In evidence law, "necessity" is sometimes used as one of the criteria to make a principled determination of an exception to the hearsay rule.

In criminal law, "necessity" is sometimes argued as a defence to a criminal offence. A person who has a sick child, for example, MAY be justified in exceeding the speed limit on the way to the hospital. An unsuccessful example of this argument can be found in R. v. Tjeltveit, 1994 CanLII 5078 (SK Q.B.):

"In essence his argument is that as he was not in the driver's seat the basis upon which he was found to be in care and control was the fact of his having the motor running and the heater on. As the reason for having the heater on was the cold weather condition which prevented his leaving the vehicle, it was thus a necessity and, therefore, he ought not to have been convicted."

no contest: No contest means that the defendant neither admits nor disputes the charge. A plea without actually admitting guilt.
not later than two hours: In Canada see section 258(1)(c).
Notice re Certificate of Analysis: If the prosecutor proceeds by certificate evidence rather than viva voce evidence of the analysis, should the accused have advance notice?
O.W.I.: Operating while intoxicated.
observation period: Mouth alcohol distorts breath readings. The officer should observe you for awhile to make sure you don't consume more alcohol or belch so that alcohol ends up in your mouth.
onus of proof: The onus of proof represents the responsibility of the crown or defense to prove either the innocence or guilt of the accused. In Canadian Criminal law, the onus is on the Crown Attorney to prove the guilt of the accused.
operates: drives
Operating or Driving: In most jurisdictions it is a criminal offence to drive or operate a motor vehicle while intoxicated. If the motor vehicle is not moving is it being driven or operated? Is it in gear, are the lights on, is it on the road? What if you are sleeping? Where is your head? Where are your feet? Are you in the driver's seat. Different jurisdictions deal with these issues in different way. Some people live in cars. If you live in a car and you sleep in the driver's seat are you operating it? See also care or control.
operation while disqualified: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
pardon: A period of time after your conviction you may be able to apply for a pardon. A pardon granted by a government authority takes away some but not all of the legal consequences of a criminal conviction.
pas: passive alcohol sensor. Hand held battery operated, flashligh, held close to driver's breath, no blowing neccessary
peace officer: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
penalties: Sentences and sentencing law varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
Physical Tests: These tests are designed to assess your physical and mental alertness. An officer may require you to perform a series of tests if he/she suspects you to be intoxicated while operationing a motor vehicle. Some of the test may include: Walking a straight line, walking frontwards or backwards, Standing on one leg etc.
police report: synopsis of events prepared by the investigating officer and included in the prosecutor's brief
post-driving alcohol consumption : No synopsis available yet. Please add.
presumpton of alcohol concentration: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
privacy: Separate the concepts:

1. An individual's right to privacy.

2. Privacy during consultation with counsel.

Privacy During Right to Counsel: An individual who is consulting with a lawyer prior to interrogation or in preparation for Court should be afforded the right to speak to that lawyer in private.
private: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
prohibition: Separate the concepts:

1. prohibition order by a judge respecting driving or operating (which is different from suspension of a driver's licence)

2. the equitable remedy of prohibition - a superior court prohibits an inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction

public documents: Information in the public domain i.e reported decision, press statements, etc. Documents made public have minimal security which allows for them to be approved for public use.
qualified technician: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
R.I.D.E.: Reduce Impaired Driving in Etobicoke. Reduce Impaired Driving Everywhere. Roadside (sometimes holiday) spot checks looking for drunk drivers.
random stop: Do police officers have the right to randomly stop you without giving you a justifed reason for the stop?
re judicata: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
Reason for the Stop: Do the police have a good reason to stop the motor vehicle?
Reasonable and Probable Grounds: A police officer must have reasonable and probable grounds prior to searching an individual. Therefore, an officer must suspect that an individual has committed a crime before they search them.
Reasonable Excuse: Without reasonable excuse, fails or reuses to provide. See section 254
reasonably suspects: See section 254 in Canada re a police officer's power to demand a roadside screening sample of breath.
reasonble time to comply: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
Reasons Given for Arrest: Should a police officer tell you what he or she is arresting you for?
reciprocal agreements: Many states and provinces have agreements with other states and provinces that cause driver's licence suspensions for a driver in his or her home state or province as the result of a conviction for an offence in another state or province.
refuses: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
regain driving privileges: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
relaying or refiling charges : No synopsis available yet. Please add.
repudiation of resolution agreement: If the prosecutor and defence reach an agreement respecting resolution of a criminal charge should it be open to the prosecutor to renege or repudiate that agreement if a later prosecutor thinks it is a bad deal, contrary to policy, or not in the public interest. Should the Crown be able to unilaterally end a plea agreement?
retain: hire a lawyer, obtain the services of an attorney, engage
right: something you own or have that the state can't ignore, protected by the law, you can give it up but probably shouldn't, police must respect it and allow for it, you should assert it, it belongs to a person because they are a person, other persons or the state need to respect it, it arises because of a law or a constitution or because you are a person
Right to Counsel: right to have a lawyer's advice before doing something particularly respecting a court case
Right to Silence: legal protection given to people undergoing police interrogation during questioning. In some countries the right to silence can also be applied to trial proceedings.
rising alcohol: The time of driving is always different from the time when the breath, blood, or urine test is taken.

Blood Alcohol Concentration is almost always different at the time of driving than it is at the time the evidentiary tests are undertaken.

During the elimination phase BAC is dropping over time because the body is eliminating alcohol at a rate between 10 mg/100mLs/hr and 20 mg/100mLs/hr. Therefore usually it is safe to assume that the BAC at time of tests by the police is lower than at the time of driving.

However, if alcohol was consumed very shortly before driving, depending on the type of alcohol, the stomach, and food, absorption of all the alcohol may be delayed (the absorption phase) and then BAC rises AFTER the driving resulting in inflated results in the police tests if the police tests are taken later in the absorption phase, during the plateau phase, or at the beginning of the elimination phase.

samples neccessary to enable proper analysis: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
sampling breath: Sampling breath provides a rapid determination of alcohol concentration in breath
Search or Seizure: When a police officer (or agent of the police) searches an individual's belongings and confiscates property.
simulator: A scientific instrument which holds a standard alcohol solution and maintains that solution at a constant temperature similar to that of human breath 34.0 +-.2 degrees C. When air is bubbled through the standard alcohol solution and pushed into a breath test instrument the standard alcohol solution can be used to calibrate or check the calibration of the breath test instrument. Depending on the SAS used the simulator can be used to simulate a human being's breath who has a 50, 100, 150, 200, or 300 mg/100mLs blood alcohol concentration.
sleeping drivers: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
slight impairment: Please be sure to differentiate impairment of ability to operate a motor vehicle.
smell of alcohol: Some people believe that pure alcohol has no odour. Others believe that their noses can detect pure alcohol. Sometimes an officer will detect the odour of an alcoholic beverage and may label that odour as strong. Sometimes an officer will label the odour as that of a particular alcoholic beverage.

Strong odour does not necessarily indicate elevated blood alcohol concentration.

sobriety: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
sobriety tests: Sometimes police officers ask persons they suspect of drunk driving to place their finger to their nose, recite the alphabet, or walk a straight line. Different jurisdictions have different laws about whether or not you have to do these and whether or not they are admissible in evidence at trial.
Stellato: This case is only applicable to Canada. There is no such case in the US.

The Ontario Court of Appeal decision in R. v. Stellato was upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada.

straddle cases: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
Subsequent Conviction: For some purposes and in some jurisdictions a conviction is considered subsequent to a previous offence only if the individual has been convicted of the first offence before the date of occurrence of the second offence. For other purposes or in other jurisdictions it is only the sequence of convictions or only the sequence of offence dates that is considered. You will need to consult a lawyer or attorney in your jurisdiction to obtain an opinion.
Suitable Sample: Breath samples vary depending on the portion of the lungs from which they are obtained. It may be up to the breath technician to determine whether or not a suitable sample has been received. That suitability may be the same or different from the suitability determined by the breath instrument itself.
suspension starts: Some jurisdictions have administrative driver's licence suspensions that start immediately on arrest.

Some jurisdictions have automatic licence suspensions that commence upon conviction.

Some jurisdictions give judges a power to prohibit driving for a period of time.

Some jurisdictions have all of the above.

technician: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
timing of demand: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
Two Tests: Any blood alcohol concentration analysis by means of a breath sample can be significantly affected by the presence of mouth alcohol. One method to reduce the possibility of this sort of error is to perform two tests. The two tests are separate breath samples taken several minutes apart. The results of analysis of these two samples are compared to see if they are in good agreement. If the samples are within 20 mg/100mLs they are considered to be in good agreement.
underage: Drinking age varies by jurisdiction.
Unreasonable Delay: Every individual has a right to proceed with their legal matter within a reasonable amount of time. If there is a delay in proceedings an individual can argue that there has been an unreasonable delay.
use of cellular phone on arrest: See R. v. George in Ontario.
vehicle: Automobile is a conveyance that transports people or objects.
vessel: A boat, ship. Does it need a motor? Can an individual be convicted of intoxicated operation of a canoe or a sailboat? all things that float except small rowboats and sailboats?
Waiver : Give up the right, refuse an offer, eg. from the police to permit communication with a lawyer. Don't sign anything entitled "Waiver" without proper legal advice.

Waiver of right to counsel, giving up one's right to a lawyer before interrogation or at Court

Waiver of juvenile matter into adult court, transferring a juvenile matter into adult Court.

who can demand: No synopsis available yet. Please add.
work in the U.S.A. with a Canadian DUI: A Canadian with a Canadian DUI, impaired driving, over 80, refusal conviction will need to speak to a US immigration attorney.
youth: Young persons, youth, or juveniles are defined differently in different jurisdictions. Most jurisdictions have special laws, procedures, and rights for the benefit of young persons having to do with their special needs. Some jurisdictions employ a child protection model (Canada's old Juvenile Delinquents Act) to youth justice and others apply a criminal justice model (Canada's Young Offenders Act and Youth Criminal Justice Act).
zero tolerance: Zero tolerance connotes community condemnation of particular behaviour. Zero tolerance policies sometimes lead to presumption of guilt. Politicians, schools, and Courts need to be wary of zero tolerance policies if guilt is presumed or other Constitutional guarantees of rights are not protected. "Zero tolerance" is sometimes used in the context of driving under the influence of alcohol since drinking and driving is a major cause of death, injury, and damage in our communities. No matter how appropriate a "zero tolerance" policy may be from the perspective of politics, it is essential that a person suspected, accused, or charged with drinking and driving be afforded due process.

 

 

For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: Allbiss Lawdata Ltd., 303-470 Hensall Circle, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5A 3V4. The author and the participants make no representation or warranty  whatsoever as to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein. Advertisement. These lawyers do not practice in association. WARNING: All information contained herein is provided for the purpose of providing basic information only and should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any and all liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are strongly encouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of the information contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from a properly retained lawyer or attorney.

 

| DUI DWI Practice Descriptions, Links, and Profiles | DUI DWI Summaries of Law | Search by Region, County, City | First Appearance in DUI Court DWI Court | Members OnlyAdd Your Firm | Delete | Privacy |

For Ontario DUI DWI  impaired driving criminal law information please visit  www.lawyers.ca 

See also Toronto DUI, Toronto DUI Attorney, Toronto DUI Lawyer, Toronto impaired driving lawyer, and Toronto lawyers

For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: Allbiss Lawdata Ltd., 303-470 Hensall Circle, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5A 3V4. The author and the participants make no representation or warranty  whatsoever as to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein. Advertisement. These lawyers do not practice in association. WARNING: All information contained herein is provided for the purpose of providing basic information only and should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any and all liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are strongly encouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of the information contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from a properly retained lawyer or attorney.