DUI DWI: International Referral Database of DUI, DWI, Impaired and Drunk Driving, Drinking and Driving, Lawyers & Attorneys

State or Province | County | Region | Attorneys | Courthouses | License & Traffic Offices | Legislation | Instruments | Standards | Experts  | Articles | Videos  
Add Attorney | Add Courthouse | Add DMV Office | Add Legislation | Add Instrument | Add Standards | Add Videos
| Home | Debate | Adding Your Firm  | Law Student DUI Dictionary  | Law Student Encyclopaedia
Words are used in Canada? DUI | DWI | Drunk Driving | Drinking and Driving | DUI Laws |  DWI Laws | Ontario dui | Ontario dui laws | Impaired Driving | Toronto DUI | Brampton DUI | Mississauga DUI

DUI : Driving Under the Influence; DWI : Driving While Intoxicated; OUI: Operating Under the Influence; OWI: Operating While Intoxicated; Impaired Driving: Impaired in Canada to Slightest Degree; Over 80: Excess BAC alcohol in Canada over 80 mg/100mL;  Care  or Control:  Occupy seat normally occupied by operator in Canada,  act or series of acts  involving use of car , fittings or equipment

Drinking and Driving Attorneys in Riverside Courts, Missouri DUI Legislation MO

This is a database of Riverside, Missouri DUI Law information contributed by Missouri drinking and driving attorneys who practice DUI law in and near Riverside, MO and who are members of the International Referral Database of DUI, DWI, Impaired and Drunk Driving, Drinking and Driving, Lawyers & Attorneys. Participation in the database is free to DUI Defense lawyers. The aim of the database is to provide the public and colleagues in other states and provinces with a great deal of good quality information about local DUI laws and practice. If the data below is incomplete, please encourage local attorneys to join and add helpful information. If a particular DUI attorney's name is not mentioned, he or she may not yet have joined the database or they may not have specifically listed "Riverside" in the region field of their profile. If a particular DUI courthouse  is not detailed, it may not yet be entered in the database or no one has  listed "Riverside" in the cities or towns served field of that courthouse.

You will find helpful information about any criminal law courthouses found in Riverside, Missouri, and perhaps motor vehicle license offices in Riverside, Missouri. Below you will also find links to Summaries of Drunk Driving Law for Missouri,information about what to do on first attendance in DUI Court in the greater Riverside, Missouri area, what clothing you should wear in DUI Court if you are in Riverside, Missouri, and why you should be early for Court in Riverside, Missouri. There are links to listings of Missouri DUI Criminal Law Courthouses and motor vehicle offices throughout Missouri. Follow the BAC instruments links and standards links to find out about the breath alcohol concentration (BAC) instruments used in Missouri.

MO DUI Drinking and Driving laws can be complex. DUI Legislation may be found by following the links to the Missouri drinking and driving statutes.   

Index of DUI Courthouses in Missouri  

Index of DMV Motor Vehicle Offices in Missouri 

Index of County Lawyer Association Pages in Missouri 

Index of Cities, Towns, Boroughs, and Villages in Missouri 

Database of DUI Attorneys and Lawyers in and near Riverside, MO 

If you are a Missouri DUI Defense Attorney and you would like to participate in this free database please click Adding Your Firm. If you are already a member of the International Referral Database of DUI, DWI, Impaired and Drunk Driving, Lawyers & Attorneys and you practice in or near " but your name does not appear in this list for we suggest that you specifically add "" to the Region field for your profile along with the name of every city, town, village, and suburb where you practice. You can greatly enhance your listing by adding information valuable to the public into the First Appearance field at your Profile.

DUI Attorney North Kansas City: J. Matthew  Guilfoil

So, you've been arrested for a Missouri DUI / DWI or other drunk driving case. You're arrested for DUI / DWI in Missouri?". There are normally both motor vehicle and court proceedings. In order to preserve your rights at both hearings, it is recommended that you seek the assistance of a DUI attorney in order to save your license.

It is important that you hire someone who specializes in Missouri DUI / DWI or other drunk driving cases if your case requires that you do more than simply appear and plea guilty. Read our tips and questions that you should ask the attorney that you are considering hiring for your Missouri DUI / DWI case.

Your first appearance in court is known as an arraignment. This is the date on your ticket, about 30 to 60 days after your arrest. It is primarily for advisement of rights. If you have an attorney, he or she will advise you.

This proceeding is where you will enter a plea of guilty or not guilty. Of course, we recommend you plead not guilty. There are a variety of police mistakes that, if properly identified, can result in your charges being dropped. If you are represented by a lawyer, you do not need to appear in court on this date, provided your attorney handles the matter for you.

Felony DUI / DWI in Missouri begins will have preliminary hearing after arraignment, unless it is waived. This is a probable cause hearing to determine if the State of Missouri has enough evidence to proceed against you. You must appear at this proceeding, even if you are represented by an attorney in the felony matter. At this proceeding, a judge decides whether your case should move on following a hearing to determine probable cause.

You should exercise your right to remain silent and speak only to your attorney! Don't make one of the biggest mistakes people make after being arrested for a DUI / DWI or other drunk driving offense!

MISSOURI DUI /DWI / BAC DRUNK DRIVING DEFENSE:

FURTHER INFORMATION:

J, J. Matthew Guilfoil, The Guilfoil Law Group, L.L.C. 1656 Washington, Suite 220 Kansas City, Missouri 64108 (816) 842-3717 phone, 1-877-DWI-MATT Toll Free Number; Email: info@kg-lawoffice.com.

Websites:

http://Missouri-dui-dwi-defense.com;   

http://www.drunkdrivingdefense.com/missouri-dui-attorney-guilfoil/; http://www.drunkdrivingdefense.com (Missouri Affiliate);

http://www.dui-dwi.com/missouri-dui-attorney-guilfoil/missouri-dui-lawyer.html; <

DWI / DUI, Drunk Driving Practice in the following Regions, Cities, and Counties in Missouri :

J. MATTHEW GUILFOIL

Education: DePaul University (B.A., Political Science); University of Missouri at Kansas City (J.D.); Mr. Guilfoil is Managing Member of The Guilfoil Law Group, L.L.C., in Kansas City, Missouri.

He has completed the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) / National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) approved 20-hour course in the administration of standardized field sobriety tests and is one of a very few defense attorneys certified as an IACP / NHTSA certified standardized field sobriety testing instructor in the State of Missouri.

He is a certified Operator of the Intoxilyzer 5000 breath testing machine. He has also completed numerous other courses on both the Intoxilyzer 5000 and Datamaster breath testing machines, which are the two breath testing machines used primarily by the police in Missouri.

He is one of only two Missouri defense attorneys to have completed the 24-hour Drug Evaluation and Classification Overview Course, which forms the basis of the IACP / NHTSA Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) program.

He attended the summer 2003 & 2006 sessions of The National College for DUI Defense, presented at Harvard Law School, and is the 2006-2007 Missouri State Delegate to the National College for DUI Defense.

He has also attended the BAC Datamaster, breath testing Training Course, in Chicago, Illinois. The BAC Datamaster is the other breath testing machine used extensively throughout Missouri in DUI / DWI or other drunk driving cases.

He is a published author for the Missouri Bar Association, having authored the “Standardized Field Sobriety Testing and Cross Examination of the Arresting Officer” chapter of their MOBARCLE “black book” series, which is a desk reference manual used by attorneys throughout the State of Missouri.

He has taught numerous courses on DWI and other topics to lawyers, police, and other law enforcement officials in Kansas and Missouri for the Kansas City Metropolitan Bar Association, the Kansas Trial Lawyer’s Association, and Lorman. In March 2006, he presented a lecture to Missouri State Water Patrol in Clay County Circuit Court, Division 6, on proper Standardized Field Sobriety Testing Procedures. He has been quoted in the Missouri Lawyer’s Weekly and the St. Louis Daily Record on DWI-related issues.

Member: The National College for DUI Defense, Inc.; The American Association of DUI Trials Lawyers; Missouri Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; Missouri Organization of Defense Lawyers; the Kansas City Metropolitan Bar Association; The Missouri Bar; Landlord’s, Inc. of Jackson County, Missouri; Northland Neighborhoods, Inc.—Board Member; Music Arts Institute of Independence, Missouri—Board Member.

Practice Areas: Mr. Guilfoil emphasizes a thorough discovery and pretrial motions practice in DUI/DWI cases; traffic; and criminal law.

Awards: Certificate of Attendance, National College for DUI Defense, presented at Harvard Law School, Summer 2003 & 2006.Certificate of course completion as a Certified Operator of the Intoxilyzer 5000 Breath Testing Machine. Certificate of Completion of the NHTSA Standardized Field Sobriety Testing Student Course. Certificate of Completion as a NHTSA-certified Standardized Field Sobriety Testing Instructor. Certificate of Completion of the 24-hour Drug Evaluation and Classification Overview Course, which forms the basis of the IACP / NHTSA Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) program. Certificate of Completion of the BAC Datamaster Course sponsored by Mary McMurray.

Email:info@guilfoillawgroup.com

SUMMARY OF MISSOURI DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCES STATUTES

Prohibited Vehicular Activity

Operation: A person commits the crime of “driving while intoxicated” if he operates a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated condition. 577.010, RSMo. 2000. NOTE: “actual physical control” has not been the standard in Missouri DWI cases since 1996.

It must always be shown that the driver drove or operated a vehicle. 577.001.1, RSMo 2000 states: “as used in this chapter, the term ‘drive’, ‘driving’, ‘operate’, or ‘operating’ means physically driving or operating a motor vehicle.”

Operation can be proven where any subject turns on a vehicle or otherwise engages the machinery of the vehicle. For instance, a person may be deemed to be operating a motor vehicle where the engine is running with the driver asleep in the car, pulled over on the side of the road. Cox v. Dir. Of Revenue, 98 S.W.3d 548 (Mo. Banc 2003); State v. Wiles, 26 S.W.3d 436 (Mo. App. S.D. 2000); State v. Mitchell, 77 S.W.3d 637 (Mo. App. W.D. 2002).

Or similarly, a person steering a moving vehicle down a hill, out of gas with the engine off, is “operating” for the purposes of the statute. Herr. v. Dir. Of Revenue, 134 S.W.3d 686 (Mo. App. E.D. 2004).

Further information on operation: http://missouri-dui-dwi-defense.com/Missouri-DUI-DWI-Lawyer/Missouri-DUI-DWI-BAC-Common-Driver-Questions-Elements-Driving-Operation-Vehicle-Intoxicated.shtml

Covered Vehicles or Devices:

The term “Motor vehicle” is not defined in the Missouri DWI statutes. However, it seems clear under recent Missouri caselaw that any motorized vehicle will suffice for these purposes. There are also separate statutes for Boating While Intoxicated cases, where a motor is not even required. Golf carts, ATVs and mini-bikes have all been deemed valid “motor vehicles” for Missouri DWI purposes. Covert v. Dir. Of Revenue, 151 S.W.3d 70 (Mo. App. E.D. 2004); State v. Laplante, 148 S.W.3d 347 (Mo. App. S.D. 2004); State v. Bailey, 140 S.W.3d 260 (Mo. App. S.D. 2004).

Covered Locations:

You do not have to be driving a motor vehicle on a “highway” to receive a DWI in Missouri. Missouri caselaw provides a person may be guilty of DWI anywhere in the state, despite language in the implied consent warning using language of “upon public highways of the state.” Private roads, private property, parking lots, etc. are all fair game. Bertram v. Dir. of Revenue, 930 S.W.2d 7 (Mo. App. W.D. 1996); Peeler v. Dir. of Revenue, 934 S.W.2d 329 (Mo. App. E.D. 1996).

Intoxicated:

It must be shown that a subject is intoxicated for a Missouri DWI charge, 577.010 RSMo., or possessing a blood alcohol concentration in excess of 0.08% or higher (without having to show any intoxication) for a BAC case (excessive blood alcohol content) pursuant to 577.012 RSMo. Any intoxication that in any manner impairs the ability of a person to operate a motor vehicle is sufficient to sustain a conviction under the Missouri DWI statute. State v. Raines, 62 S.W.2d 727, 729 (Mo. 1933).

Driving While Intoxicated Offenses:

DWI (driving while intoxicated) “A person commits the crime of “driving while intoxicated” if he operates a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated or drugged condition. Section 577.010, RSMo. 2000.

BAC (excessive blood alcohol content) (The “per se” law) (subject has a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% or higher. Section 577.012, RSMo. 2000. (0.08% BAC equals grams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath. 577.037.).

Driving while intoxicated (drugs) 577.010 lists being under the influence of a drug in the DWI statute. State v. Wilson, 846 S.W.2d 796 (Mo. App. S.D. 1993); State v. Scholl, 114 S.W.3d 304 (Mo. App. E.D. 2003); State v. Falcone, 918 S.W.2d 288 (Mo. App. S.D. 1996); State v. Walter, 918 S.W.2d 927 (Mo. App. E.D. 1996); Johnson v. Dir. Of Revenue, 168 S.W.3d 139 (Mo. App. W.D. 2005); State v. Friend, 943 S.W.2d 800 (Mo. App. W.D. 1997); State v. Walter, 918 S.W.2d 927 (Mo. App. E.D. 1996).

302.505 (DWI Under 21) If under 21, zero tolerance rules apply. 302.505 provides the per se alcohol limit for a minor to be DWI is 0.02% BAC. The under-aged driver is facing license suspension under zero tolerance, but there is currently no criminal sanction for under-aged DWI in Missouri.

Commercial Motor Vehicles If the case involves a commercial motor vehicle, “if there is .04 percentage or greater by weight of alcohol in his or her blood.” 302.780 RSMo 2000. Commercial driver will be placed out of service for 24 hours if any alcohol is found in their system. 302.755. For more information on Commercial Driver’s Licenses (CDLs) in Missouri DWI Cases http://missouri-dui-dwi-defense.com/Missouri-DUI-DWI-Lawyer/Missouri-DUI-DWI-BAC-Commercial-Driver-Licenses-CDL.shtml

Other Criminal Offenses Involving Under the Influence Offenses:

The main criminal felony driving offenses in Missouri are: DWI Persistent Offender— RSMo. Section 577.023; Assault Second Degree— RSMo. Section 565.060(4); Involuntary Manslaughter— RSMo. Section 565.024; Murder Second Degree— RSMo. Section 565.021; Leaving the Scene of a Motor Vehicle Accident— RSMo. Section 577.060; Felony Driving While Revoked or Suspended— RSMo. Section 302.321; and Felony Operation of a Motor Vehicle Without a Proper License— RSMo. Section 302.020.

For More information Click here: http://missouri-dui-dwi-defense.com/Missouri-DUI-DWI-Lawyer/Missouri-DUI-DWI-BAC-Felony-driving-offenses.shtml

Degree of Impairment Required:

Any intoxication that in any manner impairs the ability of a person to operate an automobile is sufficient to sustain a conviction for DWI. State v. Raines, 62 S.W.2d 727, 729 (Mo. 1933). A chemical test result at or above 0.08% BAC is required for a conviction for “BAC” (the “per se” law).

Penalties for Driving Under the Influence Offenses:

First offense (Class B Misdemeanor) up to 6 months is jail, up to $500.00 fine.

Second offense (Class A Misdemeanor, “prior offender”) two offenses in five years enhances up to prior offender: up to one year in jail, up to a $1000.00 fine.

Third offense (Class D Felony, “persistent offender”) three offenses in ten years: up to five years in jail, up to a $5000.00 fine.

NEW IN 2005: Section 577.023 RSMo.:

Fourth offense aggravated offender (Class C Felony) up to seven years in jail, up to a $5000.00 fine.

Fifth offense chronic offender (Class B Felony) not less than five years nor more than 15 years in prison.

An "aggravated offender" is a person who:(a) Has pleaded guilty to or has been found guilty of three or more intoxication-related traffic offenses; or (b) Has pleaded guilty to or has been found guilty of one or more intoxication- related traffic offense and, in addition, any of the following: involuntary manslaughter under subdivision (2) or (3) of subsection 1 of section 565.024, RSMo; murder in the second degree under section 565.021, RSMo, where the underlying felony is an intoxication-related traffic offense; or assault in the second degree under subdivision (4) of subsection 1 of section 565.060, RSMo; or assault of a law enforcement officer in the second degree under subdivision (4) of subsection 1 of section 565.082, RSMo;

(2) A "chronic offender" is: (a) A person who has pleaded guilty to or has been found guilty of four or more intoxication-related traffic offenses; or (b) A person who has pleaded guilty to or has been found guilty of, on two or more separate occasions, any combination of the following: involuntary manslaughter under subdivision (2) or (3) of subsection 1 of section 565.024, RSMo; murder in the second degree under section 565.021, RSMo, where the underlying felony is an intoxication-related traffic offense; assault in the second degree under subdivision (4) of subsection 1 of section 565.060, RSMo; or assault of a law enforcement officer in the second degree under subdivision (4) of subsection 1 of section 565.082, RSMo; or (c) A person who has pleaded guilty to or has been found guilty of two or more intoxication-related traffic offenses and, in addition, any of the following: involuntary manslaughter under subdivision (2) or (3) of subsection 1 of section 565.024, RSMo; murder in the second degree under section 565.021, RSMo, where the underlying felony is an intoxication-related traffic offense; assault in the second degree under subdivision (4) of subsection 1 of section 565.060, RSMo; or assault of a law enforcement officer in the second degree under subdivision (4) of subsection 1 of section 565.082, RSMo;

Penalties for Other Criminal Offenses Involving Under the Influence Offenses:

See “felony driving offenses” above. More information: http://missouri-dui-dwi-defense.com/Missouri-DUI-DWI-Lawyer/Missouri-DUI-DWI-BAC-Felony-driving-offenses.shtml

Implied Consent Laws:

Tests permitted: Blood, breath or urine – two samples as directed by law enforcement. Subject does not get to choose which test to take. 577.020.1. Krakover v. Dir. Of Revenue, 128 S.W.3d 589 (Mo. App. E.D. 2004); Dotzauer v. Dir. Of Revenue, 131 S.W.3d 371 (Mo. App. E.D. 2004); Murphy v. Dir. Of Revenue, 136 S.W.3d 141 (Mo. App. S.D. 2004); Kiso v. King, 691 S.W.2d 374 (Mo. App. W.D. 1985; State v. Brown, 804 S.W.2d 396 (Mo. App. 1991).

Type of advisement required: Of implied consent law requirements; of penalties for refusing testing

Unlike many states, in Missouri there are two separate civil proceedings where a driver might get his or her license suspended for DWI. There are administrative hearing proceedings, governed by 302.500-302.345, RSMo, for those drivers who gave a chemical test above the applicable legal limit.

There is also a separate civil license suspension hearing for chemical test refusal cases, governed by 577.020 and 577.041. First offense administrative proceedings (where the driver gave a chemical sample over the limit) are 90-day license suspensions; one year for any case where there is a prior offense within the last five years. There is a one-year license suspension for any chemical test refusal case.

For more general information:http://missouri-dui-dwi-defense.com/Missouri-DUI-DWI-Lawyer/Missouri-DUI-DWI-BAC-Law-General-Offense-Categories.shtml

Admissibility of refusal: The driver’s refusal to take field sobriety tests or a refusal to take requested chemical tests are admissible against him or her. Cain v. Dir. of Revenue, 130 S.W.3d 1 (Mo. App. S.D. 2003). Edmisten v. Dir. of Revenue, 92 S.W.3d 270, 274 (Mo. App. W.D. 2002); Hockman v. Dir. of Revenue, 103 S.W.3d 382, 385 (Mo. App. W.D. 2003); State v. Myers, 940 S.W.2d 64, 65 (Mo. App. S.D. 1997); State v. McCarty, 875 S.W.2d 622, 623 (Mo. App. S.D. 1994); RSMo. Section § 577.041; State v. Rose, 86 S.W.3d 90 (Mo. App. W.D. 2002); State v. Williams, 847 S.W.2d 111, 113 (Mo. App. W.D. 1992)

Implied Consent Laws – Accidents Involving Death or Serious Injury Tests permitted: Any two test of the driver’s blood, breath or urine are permitted in any Missouri DWI case. Subject does not get to choose which test to take. 577.020.1. Krakover v. Dir. Of Revenue, 128 S.W.3d 589 (Mo. App. E.D. 2004); Dotzauer v. Dir. Of Revenue, 131 S.W.3d 371 (Mo. App. E.D. 2004); Murphy v. Dir. Of Revenue, 136 S.W.3d 141 (Mo. App. S.D. 2004); Kiso v. King,691 S.W.2d 374 (Mo. App. W.D. 1985; State v. Brown, 804 S.W.2d 396 (Mo. App. 1991).

Rules Governing the Administration of Chemical Tests in Missouri

Chemical tests in Missouri must be performed in accordance with Missouri Department of Health Regulations 19 CSR 25-30.080. To lay a proper foundation for a breath test in a Missouri DWI trial, the State must be prepared to show that the chemical test was administered by an officer holding a valid Type II or Type III permit issued by the Department of Health, that the chemical testing machine was approved by the Department of Health, that the chemical test was administered in accordance with the guidelines established by the Department of Health, and that a maintenance test had been performed on the breath testing machine by a Type II permit holder within 35 days preceding the chemical test. Tidwell v. Dir. of Revenue, 931 S.W.2d 488 (Mo. App. S.D. 1996).

Blood-Drawing Statute:

There are both Missouri statutes and Missouri Department of Health regulations regarding blood draws in Missouri DWI cases. Missouri Department of Health Regulation 19 CSR 25-30.070(1) requires that “(b)lood samples shall be taken in accordance with the provisions of sections 577.029”

RSMo. 577.029 provides that:

“A licenses physician, registered nurse, or trained medical technician at the place of his employment, acting at the request and direction of the law enforcement officer, shall withdraw blood for the purposes of determining the alcohol content of the blood, unless such medical personnel, in his good faith medical judgment, believes such procedure would endanger the life or health of the person in custody. Blood may be withdrawn only by such medical personnel, but such restriction shall not apply to the taking of a breath test, a saliva specimen, or a urine specimen. In withdrawing blood for the purposes of determining the content thereof, only a previously unused and sterile needle and sterile vessel shall be utilized and the withdrawal shall otherwise be in strict accord with accepted medical practices. A nonalcoholic antiseptic shall be used for cleansing the skin prior to venapuncture. Upon the request of the person who is tested, full information concerning the test taken at the direction of the law enforcement officer shall be made available to him.” Id. (Emphasis added).

The State has the burden of proving absolute and literal compliance with the provisions of RSMo. 577.029 before a blood test result may be admitted into evidence. State v. Setter, 763 S.W.2d 228, 230 (Mo. App. 1988). Furthermore, “(r)ules of a state administrative agency which have been duly promulgated pursuant to proper delegated authority have the full force and effect of law.” Woodall v. Dir. of Revenue, 795 S.W.2d 419 (Mo. Ct. App. 1980). “Missouri courts have previously determined that the state must demonstrate absolute and literal compliance with statutory provisions contained in Chapter 577 regulating the manner in which blood alcohol tests are administered prerequisite to introducing the test results into evidence. See Setter, supra. These statutory enactments serve as “a substitute for the common law foundation for the introduction of evidence of analysis for blood alcohol, and are mandatory. State v. Peters, 729 S.W.2d 243, 245 (Mo. App. 1987). Similarly, where the Missouri Department of Health has enacted regulations concerning the proper methods of conducting blood alcohol tests as authorized by Chapter 577, including urine analysis, the State must demonstrate absolute and literal compliance with these regulations prerequisite to introducing the test results into evidence.” State v. Regalado, 806 S.W.2d 86, 88 (Mo. App. 1991).

Independent Test Statute:

Missouri law provides that a driver, once they have taken the chemical test requested by the law enforcement officer, may request an independent test at his or her own expense. § 577.020.5, RSMo.

Pursuant to § 577.020.5, RSMo, a subject who is arrested for DWI and submits to test at the direction of the law enforcement officer has a right to obtain an independent test by a physician, qualified technician, chemist, registered nurse, or other qualified person, at the choosing and expense of the person to be tested. Pierce v. Dir. of Revenue, 51 S.W.3d 888 (Mo. App. W.D. 2001).

It is important to note that the police do not have to inform this driver of this right under the law unless the driver knows to ask for it. The statute also does not allow the driver to choose which chemical test to take, and if the driver refuses to take the chemical test requested, he or she then waives the right to a separate test at his or her own expense, and will be deemed to have “refused.” Turner v. Dir. of Revenue, 829 S.W.2d 671 (Mo. App. W.D. 1992).

Plea Bargaining Statute:

None

Rules for Civil Administrative Hearings v. Refusal Hearings

As noted above, there are two separate civil license suspension hearings possible in Missouri, depending on whether or not a chemical test was taken, and failed, or whether or not the driver allegedly refused a chemical test.

Breath Test Administrative Hearing Cases. Regarding civil license suspensions where the driver gave a chemical test and the result was above the applicable legal limit, the issues in this type of administrative proceeding are whether there was probable cause to arrest the subject for some type of alcohol-related traffic offense and whether the subject was driving with a BAC at or above the legal limit. House v. Dir. of Revenue, 997 S.W.2d 135 (Mo. App. S.D. 1999).

In these types of cases, the driver is required to receive a notice of suspension revocation (Form 2385) if the test results are available at the time of arrest, (or it can be later mailed if the results are not available until later), and the sworn report of the officer must be filed with the Missouri Director of Revenue.

If the driver wishes to challenge the suspension/revocation of his or her driver’s license for submitting a chemical test over the legal limit, a request for administrative hearing must be filed within 15 days of being served the notice, whether the service was in person or otherwise. There are no exceptions to the 15 day filing rule, and requests that are not timely filed will be denied. Darr v. Dir. of Revenue, 897 S.W.2d 697 (Mo. App. E.D. 1994).

This type of administrative hearing is not conducted in the Circuit Court of the county where the driver was arrested, but is conducted by Director of Revenue at the first level. The driver does not get a hearing in front of a Circuit Court judge in the county of arrest unless the driver exhausts all of his or her administrative remedies. Marquart v. Dir. of Revenue, 896 S.W.2d 716 (Mo. App. E.D. 1995). In other words, if the driver does not appear at the first hearing rights to an actual trial in Circuit Court on a trial de novo appeal are waived.

If a request for an administrative hearing is requested in a timely manner in such an administrative proceeding, the driver may keep driving while the hearing is pending. If the driver does not prevail on the first level administrative hearing, he or she will have a license suspension imposed 15 days after the hearing officer’s adverse ruling against the driver, regardless or whether the driver even ultimately wins the matter at trial de novo in Circuit Court on appeal. State ex rel. Director of Revenue v. Gabbert, 925 S.W.2d 838 (Mo. banc 1996).

If the driver loses the first-level administrative hearing, a petition for trial de novo must be timely filed in the Circuit Court of the county of arrest.

Chemical Test Refusal Cases. Administrative license suspension cases involving the driver allegedly refusing a chemical test are handled differently than cases where the driver gave a chemical test result over the legal limit.

A civil refusal case is also begun by an officer filing a sworn report in the case, but the driver is given a notice of suspension/revocation for refusal. (Form 4323).

A driver’s rights and duties to properly request a civil hearing are different for a refusal. To properly request a civil refusal hearing, the driver must file within 30 days a Petition for Review challenging the refusal, directly to the Circuit Court of the county of arrest. If the driver fails to file the petition within this timeframe, his or her revocation for refusal is final. Romans v. Dir. of Revenue, 783 S.W.2d 894 (Mo. banc 1990).

The relevant issues in a refusal hearing are: whether the subject was arrested (or stopped, if under age 21); whether the officer had reasonable grounds to believe that the subject was operating a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated condition (or with a BAC of at least .02 if under age 21); and whether the subject refused to submit to the test. As part of the “refusal issue,” the State must show that a proper implied consent warning was read, and that 20 minutes were given to contact an attorney if the driver asked to speak with counsel.

You can greatly enhance your listing by adding information valuable to the public into the First Appearance field at your Profile.

Drinking and Driving Attorney in Riverside, Missouri

Impaired Driving DUI Attorney in Riverside, Missouri

 Legislation

Missouri Breath Instruments and Standard Alcohol Solutions

Intoxilyzer 5000

BAC Verifier (Out of Production)

BAC Datamaster

Alco-Sensor IV

Lawyers and DUI Information in Cities and Towns