Case Briefs
Database For Canadian Criminal Law

 R. v. Vanstaceghem

List of Similar Cases | Add Data to This Case | Edit

  Home |Add a new case | List of Issues 
Search for a Case by Name, Cite, Issue, Facts and Reasons

Find A Case That Starts With

Canadian lawyers and Judges are invited to add Additional Issues, Facts, Reasons, Anecdotes, History, Comments, Distinguished, Overruled, Approved, Considered, Corrections, or anything else helpful to readers by clicking the Add Data to This Case hyperlink above. 

ID: 78

Title: R. v. Vanstaceghem

Cite: 36 C.C.C. (3d) 142

Court: ON CA

Date: 01/06/1987

Justices: Lacourciere, Cory and Finlayson JJ.A.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

WhoWon: D

Issue: Interpreter During RTC


Charges:  


 

Facts

military policeman stopped vehicle driven by accused on Canadian Forces Base, high rate of speed, red light without a stop, inquiry of accused, responded in English, investigating officer only spoke English, odour of alcoholic beverage on breath, eyes bloodshot and glassy, opinion, demand in English, accused repliedin English that he didn't understand, officer gave him a bilingual breath demand card, accused appeared to read it, indicated he understood, informed of RTC in English, respondent advised in English that he understood, did not ask for a lawyer, breath tech spoke to accused for 10 minutes in English and about technical matters according to breath tech, accused said conversation short,samples 140 mg x2, respondent testified understood conversation slightly, worked in English and spoke English with co-workers, Appeal Court concluded a French Canadian who testified speaks French 100% better than speaks English Edit


Another Issue

not at ease with English - special circumstances Edit


Reasons

officer's knowledge that the accused was French, certainly not at ease with the English language, did not understand breath demand, special circumstances ed required the officer to reasonably ascertain that constitutional rights were understood by him ... officer's belief about accused's ability to understand and made an informed choice to waive them not reasonable in the special circumstances of this case... regrettable disregard for the respondent's constitutional rights, tend to bring administration of justice into disrepute Edit


 Biss Private Use Only


 
Click this link to Add Your Comments about: R. v. Vanstaceghem
Click here to Add a Hyperlink re  R. v. Vanstaceghem

Biss Private Use Only