Case Briefs
Database For Canadian Criminal Law

 R. v. Haas

List of Similar Cases | Add Data to This Case | Edit

  Home |Add a new case | List of Issues 
Search for a Case by Name, Cite, Issue, Facts and Reasons

Find A Case That Starts With

Canadian lawyers and Judges are invited to add Additional Issues, Facts, Reasons, Anecdotes, History, Comments, Distinguished, Overruled, Approved, Considered, Corrections, or anything else helpful to readers by clicking the Add Data to This Case hyperlink above. 

ID: 643

Title: R. v. Haas

Cite: [2004] O.J. No. 2041

Court: ON SCJ

Date: 17/05/2004

Justices: Nordhiemer J

Result: Appeal allowed; new trial ordered

WhoWon: P

Issue: Disclosure


Charges: "Over 80"


 

Facts

Charged with "over 80", prior to the trial commencing, cousel for the respondent had filed an application alleging breaches of the respondent's rights under sections 10(b) was not pursued. A voir dire was then held commencing on June 14 2002 which was principally directed towards the allged breath under section 7 and in particular the future of the Corwns to disclose the alcohol stand logbook. Appeal was allowed, the dismissal of the charge is set aside and a new trial is ordered. Edit


Reasons

Trial judge did not undertake any analysis under section 24(2) of the Charter as to whether, assuming a breach of section 8, the evidence could nonetheless be admitted. Edit


 
Click this link to Add Your Comments about: R. v. Haas
Click here to Add a Hyperlink re  R. v. Haas

Biss Private Use Only