Case Briefs
Database For Canadian Criminal Law

 R. v. Chechel

List of Similar Cases | Add Data to This Case | Edit

  Home |Add a new case | List of Issues 
Search for a Case by Name, Cite, Issue, Facts and Reasons

Find A Case That Starts With

Canadian lawyers and Judges are invited to add Additional Issues, Facts, Reasons, Anecdotes, History, Comments, Distinguished, Overruled, Approved, Considered, Corrections, or anything else helpful to readers by clicking the Add Data to This Case hyperlink above. 

ID: 241

Title: R. v. Chechel

Cite: [1999] O.J. No. 5167

Court: ON CJ

Date: 07/06/1999

Justices: Gorewich J.

Result: stay is granted

WhoWon: D

Issue: Disclosure

Charges: Impaired Driving



the appelicant submits that the video equipment which was available, and in fact used in this casse, which did record certain of jos movements, ipon arriving at and within the police station are not available. A timely rewuest for disclosure of tis material was made and this material was found to have been destoryed 30 days after the date of the charge. Application succeeds and a stay is granted. Edit


there is no dispute, a bbreach of teh accuse's rights under section 7 has occurred. I find the accused has been prejudiced in his ability to make fyll answer and defence. There has been noting presneted in this case which reduces or in som way alleviates this prejudice. Edit

 Biss Private Use Only

Click this link to Add Your Comments about: R. v. Chechel
Click here to Add a Hyperlink re  R. v. Chechel

Biss Private Use Only