Case Briefs
Database For Canadian Criminal Law

 R. v. Hufsky

List of Similar Cases | Add Data to This Case | Edit

  Home |Add a new case | List of Issues 
Search for a Case by Name, Cite, Issue, Facts and Reasons

Find A Case That Starts With

Canadian lawyers and Judges are invited to add Additional Issues, Facts, Reasons, Anecdotes, History, Comments, Distinguished, Overruled, Approved, Considered, Corrections, or anything else helpful to readers by clicking the Add Data to This Case hyperlink above. 

ID: 202

Title: R. v. Hufsky

Cite: 40 C.C.C. (3d) 398

Court: SCC

Date: 28/04/1988

Justices: Dickson C.J.C., Beetz, Estey, McIntyre, Wilson, Le Dain and La Forest JJ

Result: Appeal dismissed

WhoWon: P

Issue: Reason for the Stop


Charges: Refusal to Provide Breathalyzer Sample


 

Facts

-on January 14, 1983 accused charged with refusing to comply with a demand by police officer to provide a breath sample for analysis is a roadside screening device. -stopped by police officer who was on "spot check duty" -purpose of "spot check duty" is to check licences, insurence, mechanical fitness of cars and sobriety of the driver. -no guidelines, no criteria, standards or procedure on which vehicles should be stopped. Edit


 SCC Web Site


 Biss Private Use Only


 
Click this link to Add Your Comments about: R. v. Hufsky
Click here to Add a Hyperlink re  R. v. Hufsky

Biss Private Use Only