Case Briefs
Database For Canadian Criminal Law

 R. v. Wilson

List of Similar Cases | Add Data to This Case | Edit

  Home |Add a new case | List of Issues 
Search for a Case by Name, Cite, Issue, Facts and Reasons

Find A Case That Starts With

Canadian lawyers and Judges are invited to add Additional Issues, Facts, Reasons, Anecdotes, History, Comments, Distinguished, Overruled, Approved, Considered, Corrections, or anything else helpful to readers by clicking the Add Data to This Case hyperlink above. 

ID: 197

Title: R. v. Wilson

Cite: 56 C.C.C. (3d) 142

Court: SCC

Date: 31/05/1990

Justices: Dickson C.J.C., Lamer, Wilson, LaForest, L'Heureux-Dube, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, and McLachlin JJ.

Result: Appeal dismissed

WhoWon: P

Issue: Reason for the Stop


Charges: Impaired Driving and Over 80


 

Facts

-accused charged with impaired/over 80, stopped by a police officer in a small town -officer testified that there was nothing wrong with the accused's driving, but the officer was patrolling for impaired drivers and stopped accused because it was a block away from a bar that just closed -vehicle had out-of-province licence plate and the officer did not recognize the vehicle nor the three male occupants -once vehicle stopped officer detected odour of alcohol and accused failed a test with A.L.E.R.T device -at the station accused provided breath samples at 130 mg. of alcohol per 100 ml. of blood -at trial accused argued he had been arbitrarily detained in violation of s. 9 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms -accused convicted of the "over 80" offence and his appeal to the Alberta Court of Appeal was dismissed. Edit


 SCC Web Site


 Biss Private Use Only


 
Click this link to Add Your Comments about: R. v. Wilson
Click here to Add a Hyperlink re  R. v. Wilson

Biss Private Use Only